The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: The proportion of women at the rank of full professor in US medical schools has not increased since 1980 and remains below that of men. Whether differences in age, experience, specialty, and research productivity between sexes explain persistent disparities in faculty rank has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To analyze sex differences in faculty rank among US academic physicians. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed sex differences in faculty rank using a cross-sectional comprehensive database of US physicians with medical school faculty appointments in 2014 (91,073 physicians; 9.1% of all US physicians), linked to information on physician sex, age, years since residency, specialty, authored publications, National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding, and clinical trial investigation. We estimated sex differences in full professorship, as well as a combined outcome of associate or full professorship, adjusting for these factors in a multilevel (hierarchical) model. We also analyzed how sex differences varied with specialty and whether differences were more prevalent at schools ranked highly in research. EXPOSURES: Physician sex. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Academic faculty rank. RESULTS: In all, there were 30,464 women who were medical faculty vs 60,609 men. Of those, 3623 women (11.9%) vs 17,354 men (28.6%) had full-professor appointments, for an absolute difference of -16.7% (95% CI, -17.3% to -16.2%). Women faculty were younger and disproportionately represented in internal medicine and pediatrics. The mean total number of publications for women was 11.6 vs 24.8 for men, for a difference of -13.2 (95% CI, -13.6 to -12.7); the mean first- or last-author publications for women was 5.9 vs 13.7 for men, for a difference of -7.8 (95% CI, -8.1 to -7.5). Among 9.1% of medical faculty with an NIH grant, 6.8% (2059 of 30,464) were women and 10.3% (6237 of 60,609) were men, for a difference of -3.5% (95% CI, -3.9% to -3.1%). In all, 6.4% of women vs 8.8% of men had a trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, for a difference of -2.4% (95% CI, -2.8% to -2.0%). After multivariable adjustment, women were less likely than men to have achieved full-professor status (absolute adjusted difference in proportion, -3.8%; 95% CI, -4.4% to -3.3%). Sex-differences in full professorship were present across all specialties and did not vary according to whether a physician's medical school was ranked highly in terms of research funding. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among physicians with faculty appointments at US medical schools, there were sex differences in academic faculty rank, with women substantially less likely than men to be full professors, after accounting for age, experience, specialty, and measures of research productivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective
Jagsi, R., Guancial, E. A., Worobey, C. C., Henault, L. E., Chang, Y., Starr, R., Tarbell, N. J., & Hylek, E. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa053910 · Cited by 870
Cited by
Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools
Jena, A. B., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284 · Cited by 641
Self-citationGender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles
Chatterjee, P., & Werner, R. M. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509 · Cited by 367
Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study
Lerchenmueller, M. J., Sorenson, O., & Jena, A. B. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l6573 · Cited by 211
Self-citationPhysician Gender Is Associated with Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Scores in Outpatient Gynecology
Rogo-Gupta, L. J., Haunschild, C., Altamirano, J., Maldonado, Y. A., & Fassiotto, M. (2018) · Women's Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2018.01.001 · Cited by 85
Mete, M., Dickman, J., Rowe, S., Trockel, M. T., Rotenstein, L., Khludenev, G., & Marchalik, D. (2022) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.08.033 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Jena, A. B., Khullar, D., Ho, O., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-09-15
- Volume
- 314
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1149
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1621915916
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 111.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2015.10680
- The paper
- Jena, A. B., Khullar, D., Ho, O., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2015). Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.