Cited by 794Sinusitis and nasal conditionsCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesAsthma and respiratory diseases

Effect of Subcutaneous Dupilumab on Nasal Polyp Burden in Patients With Chronic Sinusitis and Nasal Polyposis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bachert, Claus, Mannent, Leda, Naclerio, Robert M., Mullol, Joaquim, Ferguson, Berrylin J., Gevaert, Philippe, Hellings, Peter, Jiao, Lixia +11 more·2016·JAMA

Abstract

Importance Dupilumab has demonstrated efficacy in patients with asthma and atopic dermatitis, which are both type 2 helper T-cell-mediated diseases. Objective To assess inhibition of interleukins 4 and 13 with dupilumab in patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyposis. Design, setting, and participants A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study conducted at 13 sites in the United States and Europe between August 2013 and August 2014 in 60 adults with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyposis refractory to intranasal corticosteroids with 16 weeks of follow-up. Interventions Subcutaneous dupilumab (a 600 mg loading dose followed by 300 mg weekly; n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) plus mometasone furoate nasal spray for 16 weeks. Main outcomes and measures Change in endoscopic nasal polyp score (range, 0-8; higher scores indicate worse status) at 16 weeks (primary end point). Secondary end points included Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) score (range, 0-24; higher scores indicate worse status), 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test score (range, 0-110; higher scores indicating worse quality of life; minimal clinically important difference ≥8.90), sense of smell assessed using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) score (range, 0-40; higher scores indicate better status), symptoms, and safety. Results Among the 60 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 48.4 years [9.4 years]; 34 men [56.7%]; 35 with comorbid asthma), 51 completed…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2015.19330

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biological treatments have a potentially major effect on nasal obstruction and the size of nasal polyps in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

    “These biological treatments have a potentially major effect on NO and the size of NP.”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [181]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 794

Authors
Bachert, C., Mannent, L., Naclerio, R. M., Mullol, J., Ferguson, B. J., Gevaert, P., Hellings, P., Jiao, L., Wang, L., Evans, R. R., Pirozzi, G., Graham, N. M., Swanson, B., Hamilton, J. D., Radin, A., Gandhi, N. A., Stahl, N., Yancopoulos, G. D., & Sutherland, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Sanofi (France) (FR)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Sanofi (United States) (US)
  • Regeneron (United States) (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2016-02-02
Volume
315
Issue
5
Pages
469
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2266684950
Cited by
794
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 1
FWCI
98.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • University of Missouri
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • Children's Mercy Hospital
  • School of Medicine, University of Missouri
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
dupilumab, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, type 2 inflammation, IL-4, IL-13, Lund-Mackay score, smell impairment, mometasone furoate, intranasal corticosteroids, refractory sinusitis, asthma
MeSH terms
Mometasone Furoate, Adult, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Asthma, Chronic Disease, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Polyps, Quality of Life, Sinusitis, Interleukin-4, Least-Squares Analysis, Interleukin-13, Nasal Sprays, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review