Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Based on data from the 1990s, estimated prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the United States is 10% for mild OSA and 3.8% to 6.5% for moderate to severe OSA; current prevalence may be higher, given the increasing prevalence of obesity. Severe OSA is associated with increased all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular events, diabetes, cognitive impairment, decreased quality of life, and motor vehicle crashes. OBJECTIVE: To issue a new US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults seen in primary care, including those with unrecognized symptoms. The USPSTF also evaluated the evidence on the benefits and harms of treatment of OSA on intermediate and final health outcomes. FINDINGS: The USPSTF found insufficient evidence on screening for or treatment of OSA in asymptomatic adults or adults with unrecognized symptoms. Therefore, the USPSTF was unable to determine the magnitude of the benefits or harms of screening for OSA or whether there is a net benefit or harm to screening. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults. (I statement).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No study has specifically tested whether screening for obstructive sleep apnea in primary care clinics significantly alters clinical outcomes.
“Although there is no consensus that screening for OSA in primary care clinics significantly alters clinical outcomes, 12 no study has specifically tested this question.”
From Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 175
- Authors
- US Preventive Services Task Force, Bibbins-Domingo, K., Grossman, D. C., Curry, S. J., Davidson, K. W., Epling, J. W., García, F. A. R., Herzstein, J., Kemper, A. R., Krist, A. H., Kurth, A. E., Landefeld, C. S., Mangione, C. M., Phillips, W. R., Phipps, M. G., Pignone, M. P., Silverstein, M., & Tseng, C.-W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
- Pima County Health Department (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-01-24
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2581393063
- Semantic Scholar
- 0cf905d49ab3b03f78d55ae7aa5df0b4e2b5240d
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 29
- FWCI
- 19.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Keywords
- obstructive sleep apnea, screening, asymptomatic adults, primary care, OSA prevalence, OSA treatment, cardiovascular disease, mortality, obesity, insufficient evidence, USPSTF recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Decision Making, Humans, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Prevalence, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Advisory Committees, Early Diagnosis, Asymptomatic Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review