Testosterone Treatment and Coronary Artery Plaque Volume in Older Men With Low Testosterone
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Recent studies have yielded conflicting results as to whether testosterone treatment increases cardiovascular risk. Objective: To test the hypothesis that testosterone treatment of older men with low testosterone slows progression of noncalcified coronary artery plaque volume. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial at 9 academic medical centers in the United States. The participants were 170 of 788 men aged 65 years or older with an average of 2 serum testosterone levels lower than 275 ng/dL (82 men assigned to placebo, 88 to testosterone) and symptoms suggestive of hypogonadism who were enrolled in the Testosterone Trials between June 24, 2010, and June 9, 2014. Intervention: Testosterone gel, with the dose adjusted to maintain the testosterone level in the normal range for young men, or placebo gel for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was noncalcified coronary artery plaque volume, as determined by coronary computed tomographic angiography. Secondary outcomes included total coronary artery plaque volume and coronary artery calcium score (range of 0 to >400 Agatston units, with higher values indicating more severe atherosclerosis). Results: Of 170 men who were enrolled, 138 (73 receiving testosterone treatment and 65 receiving placebo) completed the study and were available for the primary analysis. Among the 138 men, the mean (SD) age was 71.2 (5.7) years, and 81% were white. At baseline, 70 men (50.7%) had a coronary artery calcification score higher than 300 Agatston units, reflecting severe atherosclerosis. For the primary outcome, testosterone treatment compared with placebo was associated with a significantly greater increase in noncalcified plaque volume from baseline to 12 months (from median values of 204 mm3 to 232 mm3 vs 317 mm3 to 325 mm3, respectively; estimated difference, 41 mm3; 95% CI, 14 to 67 mm3; P = .003). For the secondary outcomes, the median total plaque volume increased from baseline to 12 months from 272 mm3 to 318 mm3 in the testosterone group vs from 499 mm3 to 541 mm3 in the placebo group (estimated difference, 47 mm3; 95% CI, 13 to 80 mm3; P = .006), and the median coronary artery calcification score changed from 255 to 244 Agatston units in the testosterone group vs 494 to 503 Agatston units in the placebo group (estimated difference, -27 Agatston units; 95% CI, -80 to 26 Agatston units). No major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in either group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among older men with symptomatic hypogonadism, treatment with testosterone gel for 1 year compared with placebo was associated with a significantly greater increase in coronary artery noncalcified plaque volume, as measured by coronary computed tomographic angiography. Larger studies are needed to understand the clinical implications of this finding. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00799617.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies show that testosterone replacement in old men does not significantly improve strength or cognition, increases coronary artery plaque formation, and has no effect on insulin sensitivity.
“However, some groups have shown that T replacement in old men does not provide significant benefits in strength 214-217 or cognition,218 increases coronary artery plaque formation,219 and is consistently shown to have no effect on insulin sensitivity.216, 220”
From Hormonal and Metabolic Changes of Aging and the Influence of Lifestyle Modifications (2021) · cites this paper as [219]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 376
- Authors
- Budoff, M. J., Ellenberg, S. S., Lewis, C. E., Mohler, E. R., Wenger, N. K., Bhasin, S., Barrett-Connor, E., Swerdloff, R. S., Stephens-Shields, A., Cauley, J. A., Crandall, J. P., Cunningham, G. R., Ensrud, K. E., Gill, T. M., Matsumoto, A. M., Molitch, M. E., Nakanishi, R., Nezarat, N., Matsumoto, S., Hou, X., Basaria, S., Diem, S. J., Wang, C., Cifelli, D., & Snyder, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Yale University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Snyder, Peter J.
- ORCID
- Budoff, Matthew J.
- Ellenberg, Susan S.
- Lewis, Cora E.
- Wenger, Nanette K.
- Bhasin, Shalender
- Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
- Swerdloff, Ronald S.
- Cauley, Jane A.
- Crandall, Jill P.
- Cunningham, Glenn R.
- Ensrud, Kristine E.
- Gill, Thomas M.
- Matsumoto, Alvin M.
- Molitch, Mark E.
- Nakanishi, Rine
- Nezarat, Negin
- Matsumoto, Suguru
- Hou, Xiaoling
- Basaria, Shehzad
- Diem, Susan J.
- Wang, Christina
- Snyder, Peter J.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-02-21
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 708
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- PMC
- PMC5465430
- OpenAlex
- W2591646795
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 44
- FWCI
- 38.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p60dk079626-05)
- National Institute on Aging (U01AG030644, K07AG043587, P30AG021342)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60-DK-079626, P30DK020541, P30DK079626)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- testosterone replacement therapy, androgen deficiency, hypogonadism, non-calcified plaque, coronary artery calcification, atherosclerosis, older men, testosterone gel, cardiovascular risk, coronary CT angiography, plaque progression, hormone replacement therapy, coronary heart disease prevention
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Androgens, Coronary Artery Disease, Double-Blind Method, Gels, Humans, Hypogonadism, Male, Testosterone, United States, Observer Variation, Coronary Angiography, Sample Size, Disease Progression, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Vascular Calcification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review