The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Misperceptions about prognosis by individuals making decisions for incapacitated critically ill patients (surrogates) are common and often attributed to poor comprehension of medical information. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of and factors related to physician-surrogate discordance about prognosis in intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Mixed-methods study comprising quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews conducted in 4 ICUs at a major US medical center involving surrogate decision makers and physicians caring for patients at high risk of death from January 4, 2005, to July 10, 2009. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Discordance about prognosis, defined as a difference between a physician's and a surrogate's prognostic estimates of at least 20%; misunderstandings by surrogates (defined as any difference between a physician's prognostic estimate and a surrogate's best guess of that estimate); differences in belief (any difference between a surrogate's actual estimate and their best guess of the physician's estimate). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine surrogate decision makers (median age, 47 [interquartile range {IQR}, 35-56] years; 68% women) and 99 physicians were involved in the care of 174 critically ill patients (median age, 60 [IQR, 47-74] years; 44% women). Physician-surrogate discordance about prognosis occurred in 122 of 229 instances (53%; 95% CI, 46.8%-59.7%). In 65 instances (28%), discordance was related to both misunderstandings by surrogates and differences in belief about the patient's prognosis; 38 (17%) were related to misunderstandings by surrogates only; 7 (3%) were related to differences in belief only; and data were missing for 12. Seventy-five patients (43%) died. Surrogates' prognostic estimates were much more accurate than chance alone, but physicians' prognostic estimates were statistically significantly more accurate than surrogates' (C statistic, 0.83 vs 0.74; absolute difference, 0.094; 95% CI, 0.024-0.163; P = .008). Among 71 surrogates interviewed who had beliefs about the prognosis that were more optimistic than that of the physician, the most common reasons for optimism were a need to maintain hope to benefit the patient (n = 34), a belief that the patient had unique strengths unknown to the physician (n = 24), and religious belief (n = 19). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among critically ill patients, discordant expectations about prognosis were common between patients' physicians and surrogate decision makers and were related to misunderstandings by surrogates about physicians' assessments of patients' prognoses and differences in beliefs about patients' prognoses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“their own prognostic estimates may also have served as “illocutionary acts”—that is, expressions distinct from comprehension with which they intended to express positive attitude, optimism, or faith; to highlight patients’ unrecognized qualities of resilience; or to counter clinicians’ pessimism (15, 34–36).”
From Effects of a Personalized Web-Based Decision Aid for Surrogate Decision Makers of Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Ineffective communication can result in the default provision of aggressive life support, which may conflict with patient preferences (15)”
From Effects of a Personalized Web-Based Decision Aid for Surrogate Decision Makers of Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 38,631
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis
Boyle, C., & Barker, A. (2006) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2006.1.2.36 · Cited by 11,844
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203793206-1 · Cited by 8,403
HUSKISSON, E. C. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8 · Cited by 4,533
Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.
(1999) · PubMed Central · Cited by 4,133
Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-825_9 · Cited by 3,497
A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously III Hospitalized Patients
Connors, A. F. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.274.20.1591 · Cited by 3,451
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–232 of 232
Gentry, J. H., McDowell, K., & McKinzie, P. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780197559321.003.0033
Meert, K. L., & Sachdeva, R. C. (2023) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113801
Crisis Standards of Care and Triage: Medico-Legal ConundrumsPreprint
Smith, G. P. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4849110
(2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83662-080-820241011
Hill-Oliva, M., Medavarapu, S., Chada, D., Keogh, M., Gordon, E. L., Mayer, S. A., & Dangayach, N. S. (2024) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154975
Dufour, B., Duehren, H. M., England, A. E., Keuper, K., Quinn, T. V., Shah, R. C., Diep, Q. M., Gerhart, J. I., & Greenberg, J. A. (2025) · Critical Care Explorations · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000001235
Motivated Interpretations of Survival Rates in Icon Arrays: An Issue of Frequency Format?
Strueder, J. D., Park, I., McDonnell, S. M., Basir, M., & Windschitl, P. D. (2025) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x251332315
Artificial Nudging: Improving Policy Outcomes with AI TransparencyPreprint
Carroll, B. J., Burke, P. F., & Zhou, J. J. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5386642
Andersen, S. K., Chang, C.-C. H., Arnold, R. M., Pidro, C. J., Darby, J. M., Angus, D. C., & White, D. B. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26741972
Self-citationHoward, A. F., Crowe, S., Choroszewski, L., Kovatch, J., Haynes, A. J., Ford, J. S., Beck, S. M., & Haljan, G. J. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13521228
Smirdec, M., Jourdain, M., Guastella, V., Lambert, C., Richard, J., Argaud, L., Jaber, S., Klouche, K., Médard, A., Reignier, J., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13323652
Sjöberg, F., Salzmann‐Erikson, M., Åkerman, E., Joelsson‐Alm, E., & Schandl, A. R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26264937
Smirdec, M., Jourdain, M., Guastella, V., Lambert, C., Richard, J., Argaud, L., Jaber, S., Klouche, K., Médard, A., Reignier, J., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13323649
Fleming, V., Prasad, A., Ge, C., Crawford, S., Meraj, S., Hough, C. L., Lo, B., Carson, S. S., Steingrub, J., White, D. B., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24417623
Self-citationFleming, V., Prasad, A., Ge, C., Crawford, S., Meraj, S., Hough, C. L., Lo, B., Carson, S. S., Steingrub, J., White, D. B., et al. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24417579
Self-citationSmirdec, M., Jourdain, M., Guastella, V., Lambert, C., Richard, J., Argaud, L., Jaber, S., Klouche, K., Médard, A., Reignier, J., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13323658
Zante, B., Erne, K., Grossenbacher, J., Camenisch, S. A., Schefold, J. C., & Jeitziner, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16703113
The Complex Dynamics of Decision-Making at the End of Life in the Intensive Care Unit
Georgakis, S., Gouva, M., & Koulouras, V. P. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07649-6_28
Butcher, B. W., Morris, L. R., & Baram, M. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009501477.003
Otani, H., Morita, T., Aoyama, M., Tsuneto, S., Mori, M., & Miyashita, M. (2026) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-026-10417-3
Epidemiology of Inpatient Paediatric Mortalities From 2011 to 2020: A Retrospective Review
Low, S. Z. Q., Lee, J. H., Sultana, R., Lim, Y. J., Ang, L. B., Wee, P. H., & Lim, J. K. B. (2026) · Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health · doi:10.1111/jpc.70365
Association of Palliative Care Consultation with Outcomes after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Patarroyo‐Aponte, G., Amjad, M. A., Bertini, C. D., Pinchover, Z. S., Perez, K. D. E., Hernandez, A. V. A., Cortes, J., Ahmed, S. Z., Sarver, B., Zhang, S., et al. (2026) · American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® · doi:10.1177/10499091261458693
Frei, A. I., Berger, S., Grzonka, P., Amacher, S. A., Kliem, P. S. C., Gebhard, C. E., Hunziker, S., & Sutter, R. (2026) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000007264
Communiquer en anesthésie-réanimation et médecine péri-opératoire
Dorze, M. L., & Michel, F. (2022) · Arnette eBooks · doi:10.3917/arne.brune.2022.01.0238
Ray, E. M., Zhang, X., Dunham, L. N., Tan, X. M., Lafata, J. E., & Reeder-Hayes, K. E. (2026) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op-25-00610
Brooks, L. A., Bloomer, M. J., Jones, D. A., & Subramaniam, A. (2026) · Australian Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2026.101694
Communication Challenges in the Prenatal Care of Infants With Surgical Congenital Anomalies
Obayemi, J. E., Johnson, M., Knoepp, P., Sharpe, J., Phillips, M. R., Elton, S., Goodnight, W., McLean, S. E., DeWalt, D. A., & Akinkuotu, A. C. (2026) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2026.08.043
Tareen, M., Khan, J., Alzaabi, M. A., Ibrahim, M., Gefe, D., Alsatari, L., Helal, M., Askalany, M., Hamed, F., Carvalho, T., et al. (2026) · Journal of Intensive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jointm.2026.09.003
Shared decision making in intensive care
Zvara, M., & Rusínová, K. (2026) · Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína · doi:10.36290/aim.2026.034
Tools Measuring Health Literacy in Critically Ill Patients and Their Caregivers: A Scoping Review
Poulin, T. G., Krewulak, K. D., Arakawa, N. C., Shahid, A., Stelfox, H. T., & Fiest, K. M. (2026) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000007382
Pineda, J. P. C., Fernandez, Z. S., & Ramirez, D. Q. (2026) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2026.110344
Badawy, W., Elsayed, F. K., & Gouhar, G. K. (2026) · Nursing in Critical Care · doi:10.1111/nicc.70752
Metadata
- Authors
- White, D. B., Ernecoff, N., Buddadhumaruk, P., Hong, S., Weissfeld, L., Curtis, J. R., Luce, J. M., & Lo, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Statistics Collaborative (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- White, Douglas B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2016-05-17
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2086
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2407608263
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 25.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL094553)
- National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024130)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Keywords
- prognosis, surrogate decision makers, critically ill patients, intensive care unit, physician communication, end-of-life decisions, prognostic accuracy, advance care planning, physician-patient communication
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude, Culture, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Probability, Prognosis, Terminal Care, Critical Illness, Proxy, Comprehension, Dissent and Disputes, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
