The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Urinary incontinence, the involuntary loss of urine, is a common health condition that may decrease quality of life. Ten to twenty percent of women and up to 77% of women residing in nursing homes have urinary incontinence, yet only 25% seek or receive treatment. OBSERVATIONS: This review summarizes the evaluation and therapeutic options for women affected by urinary incontinence. The initial assessment should focus on understanding the effect of incontinence on quality of life, the patient's goals and preferences for treatment, the results of previous treatments, and the presence of concomitant conditions, such as advanced pelvic organ prolapse, that may require referral. Infection and hematuria need to be ruled out. In the absence of urinary infection or serious underlying pathology (such as cancer or serious neurologic disease) associated with urinary incontinence, the clinician should initiate unsupervised pelvic muscle exercises and lifestyle modifications appropriate to the patient to reduce her symptoms. These recommendations can include weight loss, adequate hydration, avoidance of excessive fluids, and regular voiding intervals that reduce urgency incontinence episodes. Urgency incontinence medications, with timely reassessment of symptoms, can be started without extensive evaluation. Specialist treatments for urgency incontinence include onabotulinumtoxinA and percutaneous or implanted neuromodulators. Stress incontinence surgery, the midurethral sling, is associated with symptom improvement in 48% to 90% of women and has low rates of mesh complications (<5%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Urinary incontinence is common in women, although few seek care despite many effective treatment options. Clinicians should prioritize urinary incontinence detection, identify and treat modifiable factors, incorporate patient preference into evaluation and treatment, initiate conservative and medical therapy, and refer to specialists when underlying pathology is identified or conservative measures are ineffective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women
Nygaard, I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1311 · Cited by 1,869
Dumoulin, C., Hay-Smith, E. J. C., & Mac Habée-Séguin, G. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005654.pub3 · Cited by 1,105
Abrams, P., Andersson, K., Apostolidis, A., Birder, L., Bliss, D., Brubaker, L., Cardozo, L., Castro‐Diaz, D., O'Connell, P. R., Cottenden, A., et al. (2018) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.23551 · Cited by 1,104
Self-citationPrevalence and Trends of Symptomatic Pelvic Floor Disorders in U.S. Women
Wu, J. M., Vaughan, C. P., Goode, P. S., Redden, D. T., Burgio, K. L., Richter, H. E., & Markland, A. D. (2014) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000057 · Cited by 940
Gormley, E. A., Lightner, D. J., Faraday, M., & Vasavada, S. P. (2015) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.087 · Cited by 789
The Female Urinary Microbiome: a Comparison of Women with and without Urgency Urinary Incontinence
Pearce, M. M., Hilt, E. E., Rosenfeld, A. B., Zilliox, M. J., Thomas-White, K., Fok, C., Kliethermes, S., Schreckenberger, P. C., Brubaker, L., Gai, X., et al. (2014) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01283-14 · Cited by 725
Self-citationRetropubic versus Transobturator Midurethral Slings for Stress Incontinence
Richter, H. E., Albo, M. E., Zyczynski, H. M., Kenton, K., Norton, P. A., Sirls, L. T., Kraus, S. R., Chai, T. C., Lemack, G. E., Dandreo, K. J., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0912658 · Cited by 693
Self-citationMid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women
Ford, A. A., Rogerson, L., Cody, J. D., Aluko, P., & Ogah, J. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006375.pub4 · Cited by 691
Weight Loss to Treat Urinary Incontinence in Overweight and Obese Women
Subak, L. L., Wing, R., West, D. S., Franklin, F., Vittinghoff, E., Creasman, J. M., Richter, H. E., Myers, D., Burgio, K. L., Gorin, A. A., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0806375 · Cited by 630
Norton, P., & Brubaker, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)67925-7 · Cited by 579
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lukacz, E. S., Santiago-Lastra, Y., Albo, M. E., & Brubaker, L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-10-24
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1592
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2766947181
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 24.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2017.12137
- The paper
- Lukacz, E. S., Santiago-Lastra, Y., Albo, M. E., & Brubaker, L. (2017). Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.12137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.