The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Previous studies have shown increasing prevalence of diabetes in China, which now has the world's largest diabetes epidemic. Objectives: To estimate the recent prevalence and to investigate the ethnic variation of diabetes and prediabetes in the Chinese adult population. Design, Setting, and Participants: A nationally representative cross-sectional survey in 2013 in mainland China, which consisted of 170 287 participants. Exposures: Fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels were measured for all participants. A 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test was conducted for all participants without diagnosed diabetes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were total diabetes and prediabetes defined according to the 2010 American Diabetes Association criteria. Awareness and treatment were also evaluated. Hemoglobin A1c concentration of less than 7.0% among treated diabetes patients was considered adequate glycemic control. Minority ethnic groups in China with at least 1000 participants (Tibetan, Zhuang, Manchu, Uyghur, and Muslim) were compared with Han participants. Results: Among the Chinese adult population, the estimated standardized prevalence of total diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes was 10.9% (95% CI, 10.4%-11.5%); that of diagnosed diabetes, 4.0% (95% CI, 3.6%-4.3%); and that of prediabetes, 35.7% (95% CI, 34.1%-37.4%). Among persons with diabetes, 36.5% (95% CI, 34.3%-38.6%) were aware of their diagnosis and 32.2% (95% CI, 30.1%-34.2%) were treated; 49.2% (95% CI, 46.9%-51.5%) of patients treated had adequate glycemic control. Tibetan and Muslim Chinese had significantly lower crude prevalence of diabetes than Han participants (14.7% [95% CI, 14.6%-14.9%] for Han, 4.3% [95% CI, 3.5%-5.0%] for Tibetan, and 10.6% [95% CI, 9.3%-11.9%] for Muslim; P < .001 for Tibetan and Muslim compared with Han). In the multivariable logistic models, the adjusted odds ratios compared with Han participants were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.35-0.50) for diabetes and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.84) for prediabetes for Tibetan Chinese and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63-0.85) for diabetes and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71-0.86) for prediabetes in Muslim Chinese. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults in China, the estimated overall prevalence of diabetes was 10.9%, and that for prediabetes was 35.7%. Differences from previous estimates for 2010 may be due to an alternate method of measuring hemoglobin A1c.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60484-9 · Cited by 5,125
Prevalence of Diabetes among Men and Women in China
Yang, W., Lu, J., Weng, J., Jia, W., Ji, L., Xiao, J., Shan, Z., Liu, J., Tian, H., Ji, Q., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0908292 · Cited by 3,031
Self-citationDiabetes Mellitus, Fasting Glucose, and Risk of Cause-Specific Death
The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1008862 · Cited by 2,726
Liu, S., Wu, X., Lopez, A. D., Wang, L., Cai, Y., Page, A., Yin, P., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Liu, J., et al. (2016) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.15.153148 · Cited by 395
Self-citation
Cited by
Feldman, E. L., Callaghan, B. C., Pop-Busui, R., Zochodne, D. W., Wright, D. E., Bennett, D. L., Bril, V., Russell, J. W., & Viswanathan, V. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0092-1 · Cited by 1,697
Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations
Li, X., Krumholz, H. M., Yip, W., Cheng, K. K., De Maeseneer, J., Meng, Q., Mossialos, E., Li, C., Lu, J., Su, M., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30122-7 · Cited by 914
Cai, X., Zhang, Y., Li, M., Wu, J. H., Mai, L., Li, J., Yang, Y., Hu, Y., & Huang, Y. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m2297 · Cited by 749
Self-citationDigital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: A global perspective
Li, J.-P. O., Liu, H., Ting, D. S. J., Jeon, S., Chan, R. V. P., Kim, J. E., Sim, D. A., Thomas, P. B. M., Lin, H., Chen, Y., et al. (2021) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100900 · Cited by 626
Wang, Y.-J., Li, Z.-X., Gu, H.-Q., Zhai, Y., Jiang, Y., Zhao, X.-Q., Wang, Y.-L., Yang, X., Wang, C.-J., Meng, X., et al. (2020) · Stroke and Vascular Neurology · doi:10.1136/svn-2020-000457 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Gao, P., Zhang, M., Huang, Z., Zhang, D., Deng, Q., Li, Y., Zhao, Z., Qin, X., Jin, D., Zhou, M., Tang, X., Hu, Y., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-06-27
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2515
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2731349674
- Cited by
- 1,844
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 136.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2017.7596
- The paper
- Wang, L., Gao, P., Zhang, M., Huang, Z., Zhang, D., Deng, Q., Li, Y., Zhao, Z., Qin, X., Jin, D., Zhou, M., Tang, X., Hu, Y., & Wang, L. (2017). Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7596
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.