Cited by 131Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Effect of Loading Dose of Atorvastatin Prior to Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: The SECURE-PCI Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Berwanger, Otavio, Santucci, Eliana Vieira, de Barros e Silva, Pedro Gabriel Melo, Jesuíno, Isabella de Andrade, Damiani, Lucas Petri, Barbosa, Lilian Mazza, Santos, Renato Hideo Nakagawa, Laranjeira, Ligia Nasi +27 more·2018·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: The effects of loading doses of statins on clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and planned invasive management remain uncertain. Objective: To determine if periprocedural loading doses of atorvastatin decrease 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS and planned invasive management. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted at 53 sites in Brazil among 4191 patients with ACS evaluated with coronary angiography to proceed with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if anatomically feasible. Enrollment occurred between April 18, 2012, and October 6, 2017. Final follow-up for 30-day outcomes was on November 6, 2017. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive 2 loading doses of 80 mg of atorvastatin (n = 2087) or matching placebo (n = 2104) before and 24 hours after a planned PCI. All patients received 40 mg of atorvastatin for 30 days starting 24 hours after the second dose of study medication. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was MACE, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned coronary revascularization through 30 days. Results: Among the 4191 patients (mean age, 61.8 [SD, 11.5] years; 1085 women [25.9%]) enrolled, 4163 (99.3%) completed 30-day follow-up. A total of 2710 (64.7%) underwent PCI, 333 (8%) underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and 1144 (27.3%) had exclusively medical management. At 30 days, 130 patients in the atorvastatin group (6.2%) and 149 in the placebo group (7.1%) had a MACE (absolute difference, 0.85% [95% CI, -0.70% to 2.41%]; hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.69-1.11; P = .27). No cases of hepatic failure were reported; 3 cases of rhabdomyolysis were reported in the placebo group (0.1%) and 0 in the atorvastatin group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with ACS and planned invasive management with PCI, periprocedural loading doses of atorvastatin did not reduce the rate of MACE at 30 days. These findings do not support the routine use of loading doses of atorvastatin among unselected patients with ACS and intended invasive management. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01448642.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2018.2444

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of fibrates in 11,590 people with type 2 diabetes showed a significant 21% reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction, but no effect on overall or coronary mortality.

    “Consistent with these findings, a metaanalysis of fibrates in the prevention of CVD in 11 590 people with T2DM showed that fibrates significantly reduced the risk of non-fatal MI by 21%, but had no effect on the risk of overall mortality or coronary mortality [422].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 131

Authors
Berwanger, O., Santucci, E. V., de Barros e Silva, P. G. M., Jesuíno, I. D. A., Damiani, L. P., Barbosa, L. M., Santos, R. H. N., Laranjeira, L. N., Egydio, F. D. M., Borges de Oliveira, J. A., Dall Orto, F. T. C., Beraldo de Andrade, P., Bienert, I. R. D. C., Bosso, C. E., Mangione, J. A., Polanczyk, C. A., Sousa, A. G. D. M. R., Kalil, R. A. K., Santos, L. D. M., Sposito, A. C., Rech, R. L., Sousa, A. C. S., Baldissera, F., Nascimento, B. R., Giraldez, R. R. C. V., Cavalcanti, A. B., Pereira, S. B., Mattos, L. A., Armaganijan, L. V., Guimarães, H. P., Sousa, J. E. M. R., Alexander, J. H., Granger, C. B., Lopes, R. D., & for the SECURE-PCI Investigators
Affiliations
  • Research Institute–Heart Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Brazilian Clinical Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Hospital do Coração de Poços de Caldas, Poços de Caldas, Brazil
  • Santa Casa de Marília, Marília, Brazil
  • Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (BR)
  • Santa Casa de Presidente Prudente/Instituto do Coração de Presidente Prudente, Presidente Prudente, Brazil
  • Hospital São Francisco de Assis, Bragança Paulista, Brazil
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia (BR)
  • Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (BR)
  • Instituto de Cardiologia do Distrito Federal (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Hospital Universitário de Canoas, Canoas, Brazil
  • Hospital São Lucas, Aracaju, Brazil
  • Instituto de Pesquisa e Estudos Médicos de Itajaí, Itajaí, Brazil
  • Hospital Universitário Ciências Médicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
  • Instituto do Coração - HCFMUSP (BR)
  • Rede D’Or São Luiz, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Berwanger, Otavio
Venue
JAMA
Published
2018-04-03
Volume
319
Issue
13
Pages
1331
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2790531075
Cited by
131
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20
FWCI
20.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Gilead Sciences
  • CSL Behring
  • Tenax Therapeutics
  • Zafgen
  • CryoLife
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Faculdade de Medicina de Marília
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • Ministério da Saúde
  • Sirtex Medical
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
atorvastatin, acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, major adverse cardiovascular events, 30-day outcomes, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, all-cause mortality, coronary artery bypass grafting, lipid-lowering therapy, coronary angiography, coronary thrombolysis
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Preoperative Care, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review