Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer: The SCORAD Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Malignant spinal canal compression, a major complication of metastatic cancer, is managed with radiotherapy to maintain mobility and relieve pain, although there is no standard radiotherapy regimen. Objective: To evaluate whether single-fraction radiotherapy is noninferior to 5 fractions of radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted in 42 UK and 5 Australian radiotherapy centers. Eligible patients (n = 686) had metastatic cancer with spinal cord or cauda equina compression, life expectancy greater than 8 weeks, and no previous radiotherapy to the same area. Patients were recruited between February 2008 and April 2016, with final follow-up in September 2017. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive external beam single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy (n = 345) or 20 Gy of radiotherapy in 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days (n = 341). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was ambulatory status at week 8, based on a 4-point scale and classified as grade 1 (ambulatory without the use of aids and grade 5 of 5 muscle power) or grade 2 (ambulatory using aids or grade 4 of 5 muscle power). The noninferiority margin for the difference in ambulatory status was -11%. Secondary end points included ambulatory status at weeks 1, 4, and 12 and overall survival. Results: Among 686 randomized patients (median [interquartile range] age, 70 [64-77] years; 503 (73%) men; 44% had prostate cancer, 19% had lung cancer, and 12% had breast cancer), 342 (49.8%) were analyzed for the primary end point (255 patients died before the 8-week assessment). Ambulatory status grade 1 or 2 at week 8 was achieved by 115 of 166 (69.3%) patients in the single-fraction group vs 128 of 176 (72.7%) in the multifraction group (difference, -3.5% [1-sided 95% CI, -11.5% to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .06). The difference in ambulatory status grade 1 or 2 in the single-fraction vs multifraction group was -0.4% (63.9% vs 64.3%; [1-sided 95% CI, -6.9 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .004) at week 1, -0.7% (66.8% vs 67.6%; [1-sided 95% CI, -8.1 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .01) at week 4, and 4.1% (71.8% vs 67.7%; [1-sided 95% CI, -4.6 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .002) at week 12. Overall survival rates at 12 weeks were 50% in the single-fraction group vs 55% in the multifraction group (stratified hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.74-1.41]). Of the 11 other secondary end points that were analyzed, the between-group differences were not statistically significant or did not meet noninferiority criterion. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with malignant metastatic solid tumors and spinal canal compression, a single radiotherapy dose, compared with a multifraction dose delivered over 5 days, did not meet the criterion for noninferiority for the primary outcome (ambulatory at 8 weeks). However, the extent to which the lower bound of the CI overlapped with the noninferiority margin should be considered when interpreting the clinical importance of this finding. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Identifiers: ISRCTN97555949 and ISRCTN97108008.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For early breast cancer, the FAST-Forward trial found that a shorter adjuvant RT course of 26 Gy in 5 fractions was non-inferior to the standard 40 Gy in 15 fractions.
“For early breast cancer, 15% of patients enrolled in the FAST-Forward study experimental arm were aged 70 years and older and this trial confirmed non-inferiority of a shorter course of adjuvant RT (26 Gy in 5 fractions) compared with a standard regimen of 40 Gy in 15 fractions [53].”
The FAST-Forward trial's experimental arm included 15% of patients aged 70 years and above.
“For early breast cancer, 15% of patients enrolled in the FAST-Forward study experimental arm were aged 70 years and older and this trial confirmed non-inferiority of a shorter course of adjuvant RT (26 Gy in 5 fractions) compared with a standard regimen of 40 Gy in 15 fractions [53].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- StataCorp. Stata 15 Multiple-imputation Manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2017.
- Oxford Cancer Intelligence Unit National Cancer Intelligence Network. Travel times and distances to radiotherapy centres for head and neck cancer patients in England (2006-2008). http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_type_and_topic_ specific_work/cancer_type_specific_work/head_and_ neck_cancers/head_and_neck_cancer_hub/ resources. Published 2012. Accessed November 9, 2018.
- Authors
- Hoskin, P. J., Hopkins, K., Misra, V., Holt, T., McMenemin, R., Dubois, D., McKinna, F., Foran, B., Madhavan, K., MacGregor, C., Bates, A., O’Rourke, N., Lester, J. F., Sevitt, T., Roos, D., Dixit, S., Brown, G., Arnott, S., Thomas, S. S., Forsyth, S., Beare, S., Reczko, K., Hackshaw, A., & Lopes, A.
- Affiliations
- Mount Vernon Hospital (GB)
- At Bristol (GB)
- The Christie Hospital (GB)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Freeman Hospital (GB)
- Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB)
- Royal Sussex County Hospital (GB)
- Weston Park Cancer Centre (GB)
- Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Raigmore Hospital (GB)
- Southampton General Hospital (GB)
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Velindre Cancer Centre (GB)
- Maidstone Hospital (GB)
- Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
- Castle Hill Hospital (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hoskin, Peter J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-12-03
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2084
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- PMC
- PMC6902166
- OpenAlex
- W2993942484
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK (11408)
- Royal Adelaide Hospital
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
- Cancer Council Queensland
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Management of metastatic bone disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
- Keywords
- single-fraction radiotherapy, spinal canal compression, metastatic cancer, cauda equina compression, ambulatory status, non-inferiority, external beam radiotherapy, overall survival, spinal cord compression, mobility outcomes, analgesia, prostate cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, dose fractionation, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Radiation Dosage, Radiotherapy, Spinal Cord Compression, Survival Rate, Proportional Hazards Models, Dose Fractionation, Radiation, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review