Cited by 243Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Effect of Renal Denervation and Catheter Ablation vs Catheter Ablation Alone on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Among Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension: The ERADICATE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Steinberg, Jonathan S., Shabanov, Vitaliy, Ponomarev, Dmitry, Losik, Denis, Ivanickiy, Eduard, Kropotkin, Evgeny, Polyakov, Konstantin, Ptaszynski, Pawel +4 more·2020·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Renal denervation can reduce cardiac sympathetic activity that may result in an antiarrhythmic effect on atrial fibrillation. Objective: To determine whether renal denervation when added to pulmonary vein isolation enhances long-term antiarrhythmic efficacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Evaluate Renal Denervation in Addition to Catheter Ablation to Eliminate Atrial Fibrillation (ERADICATE-AF) trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted at 5 referral centers for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the Russian Federation, Poland, and Germany. A total of 302 patients with hypertension despite taking at least 1 antihypertensive medication, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and plans for ablation were enrolled from April 2013 to March 2018. Follow-up concluded in March 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized to either pulmonary vein isolation alone (n = 148) or pulmonary vein isolation plus renal denervation (n = 154). Complete pulmonary vein isolation to v an end point of elimination of all pulmonary vein potentials; renal denervation using an irrigated-tip ablation catheter delivering radiofrequency energy to discrete sites in a spiral pattern from distal to proximal in both renal arteries. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was freedom from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia at 12 months. Secondary end points included procedural complications within 30 days and blood pressure control at 6 and 12 months. Results: Of the 302 randomized patients (median age, 60 years [interquartile range, 55-65 years]; 182 men [60.3%]), 283 (93.7%) completed the trial. All successfully underwent their assigned procedures. Freedom from atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardia at 12 months was observed in 84 of 148 (56.5%) of those undergoing pulmonary vein isolation alone and in 111 of 154 (72.1%) of those undergoing pulmonary vein isolation plus renal denervation (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.85; P = .006). Of 5 prespecified secondary end points, 4 are reported and 3 differed between groups. Mean systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months decreased from 151 mm Hg to 147 mm Hg in the isolation-only group and from 150 mm Hg to 135 mm Hg in the renal denervation group (between-group difference, -13 mm Hg; 95% CI, -15 to -11 mm Hg; P < .001). Procedural complications occurred in 7 patients (4.7%) in the isolation-only group and 7 (4.5%) of the renal denervation group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and hypertension, renal denervation added to catheter ablation, compared with catheter ablation alone, significantly increased the likelihood of freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12 months. The lack of a formal sham-control renal denervation procedure should be considered in interpreting the results of this trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01873352.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2019.21187

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the ERADICATE-AF trial, patients with hypertension and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent pulmonary vein isolation plus radiofrequency renal denervation had higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months and greater reduction in systolic blood pressure than those who underwent pulmonary vein isolation alone.

    “At 12 months, 56.5% of the participants who underwent PVI alone versus 72.1% of those who underwent PVI plus RDN were free from atrial arrhythmia (hazard ratio 0.57, P = 0.006). In addition, mean SBP decreased by 4 mmHg and 15 mmHg from baseline to 12 months in the PVI alone and PVI plus RDN groups, respectively (P < 0.001).”

    From Renal nerves in physiology, pathophysiology and interoception (2025) · cites this paper as [163]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 243

Authors
Steinberg, J. S., Shabanov, V., Ponomarev, D., Losik, D., Ivanickiy, E., Kropotkin, E., Polyakov, K., Ptaszynski, P., Keweloh, B., Yao, C. J., Pokushalov, E. A., & Romanov, A. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
  • Meshalkin National Medical Research Center (RU)
  • Federal Center of Cardiovascular Surgery, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
  • Federal Center of Cardiovascular Surgery, Khabarovosk, Russian Federation
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Steinberg, Jonathan S.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2020-01-21
Volume
323
Issue
3
Pages
248
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3001653010
Cited by
243
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 30
FWCI
22.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Heart Rhythm Society
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
renal denervation, catheter ablation, pulmonary vein isolation, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertension, atrial fibrillation recurrence, antiarrhythmic efficacy, blood pressure control, cardiac sympathetic activity, radiofrequency ablation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, procedural complications
MeSH terms
Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Combined Modality Therapy, Drug Resistance, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Veins, Sympathectomy, Single-Blind Method, Catheter Ablation, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review