The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines
Open accessAbstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines hold promise to control the pandemic, and help restore normal social and economic life. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for 2 mRNA vaccines and will likely issue full biologics licenses in the coming months. Anticipating vaccine scarcity, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) published guidance on vaccine priorities.Data show 95% efficacy for vaccines granted an EUA, but even highly effective vaccines cannot curb the pandemic without high population coverage and maintenance of other mitigation strategies. Recent data from 1,676 adults surveyed November 30-December 8, 2020 found that when a COVID-19 vaccine is approved and widely available: 34% would get it as soon as possible; 39% would wait; 9% would only get it if required for work/school; 15% would definitely not get it. Black persons, at high risk of infection and hospitalization, are less likely to report vaccine intent with only 20% reporting they would get the vaccine soon and 52% intending to wait. Intent to vaccinate has changed substantially over time and is likely to evolve. In this JAMA Viewpoint, we examine whether vaccine mandates would be lawful and ethical, and whether they could boost vaccine uptake.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heads of governments, schools, healthcare facilities, and private businesses, misled by the vaccines' reported 95% relative risk reduction, enforced vaccine mandates upon workers and the public who use their services.
“Finally, heads of governments, schools, healthcare facilities, and private businesses, misled by the vaccines’ reported 95% RRR, enforced vaccine mandates upon workers and the public who use their services [45].”
From Relative risk reduction: Misinformative measure in clinical trials and COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 1 · Cited by 166
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Phadke, 2016, Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States., JAMA, 315, 1149, 10.1001/jama.2016.1353 · DOI
- Cash-Goldwasser? S, Kardooni? S, Cobb? L, Bochner? A, Bradford? E, Shahpar? C. Immunity passports. COVID-19 Science Review. Posted December 15, 2020. Accessed December 16, 2020. https://preventepidemics.org/covid19/science/weekly-science-review/december-5-11-2020/?
Metadata
- Authors
- Gostin, L. O., Salmon, D. A., & Larson, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gostin, Lawrence O.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2021-02-09
- Volume
- 325
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 532
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W3114726562
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 39
- FWCI
- 19.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- autopapers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholarship - GEORGETOWN LAW (Georgetown University) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- COVID-19 vaccines, mandatory vaccination, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine uptake, vaccination intention, mRNA vaccines, emergency use authorization, vaccine prioritization, SARS-CoV-2
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Attitude to Health, Commerce, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, United States, Organizational Policy, Mandatory Programs, Health Facility Administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review