The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Many women spend a substantial proportion of their lives preventing or planning for pregnancy, and approximately 87% of US women use contraception during their lifetime. OBSERVATIONS: Contraceptive effectiveness is determined by a combination of drug or device efficacy, individual fecundability, coital frequency, and user adherence and continuation. In the US, oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used reversible method of contraception and comprise 21.9% of all contraception in current use. Pregnancy rates of women using oral contraceptives are 4% to 7% per year. Use of long-acting methods, such as intrauterine devices and subdermal implants, has increased substantially, from 6% of all contraceptive users in 2008 to 17.8% in 2016; these methods have failure rates of less than 1% per year. Estrogen-containing methods, such as combined oral contraceptive pills, increase the risk of venous thrombosis from 2 to 10 venous thrombotic events per 10 000 women-years to 7 to 10 venous thrombotic events per 10 000 women-years, whereas progestin-only and nonhormonal methods, such as implants and condoms, are associated with rare serious risks. Hormonal contraceptives can improve medical conditions associated with hormonal changes related to the menstrual cycle, such as acne, endometriosis, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Optimal contraceptive selection requires patient and clinician discussion of the patient's tolerance for risk of pregnancy, menstrual bleeding changes, other risks, and personal values and preferences. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used reversible contraceptives, intrauterine devices and subdermal implants have the highest effectiveness, and progestin-only and nonhormonal methods have the lowest risks. Optimal contraceptive selection incorporates patient values and preferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception
Winner, B., Peipert, J. F., Zhao, Q., Buckel, C., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1110855 · Cited by 1,154
Classification and pharmacology of progestins
Schindler, A. E., Campagnoli, C., Druckmann, R., Huber, J., Pasqualini, J. R., Schweppe, K. W., & Thijssen, J. H. H. (2003) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.09.014 · Cited by 745
Cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of estrogens and its regulation in human
Tsuchiya, Y., Nakajima, M., & Yokoi, T. (2005) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2004.10.007 · Cited by 616
von Hertzen, H., Piaggio, G., Peregoudov, A., Ding, J., Chen, J., Song, S., Bártfai, G., Ng, E., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., Oyunbileg, A., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11767-3 · Cited by 570
Glasier, A. F., Cameron, S. T., Fine, P. M., Logan, S. J., Casale, W., Van Horn, J., Sogor, L., Blithe, D. L., Scherrer, B., Mathe, H., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60101-8 · Cited by 526
Investigation of relation between use of oral contraceptives and thromboembolic disease.
Vessey, M. P., & Doll, R. (1968) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5599.199 · Cited by 470
Dinger, J. C., Heinemann, L. A. J., & Kühl-Habich, D. (2007) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.019 · Cited by 470
Stroke in Users of Low-Dose Oral Contraceptives
Petitti, D. B., Sidney, S., Bernstein, A., Wolf, S., Quesenberry, C., & Ziel, H. K. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199607043350102 · Cited by 329
Use of Copper Intrauterine Devices and the Risk of Tubal Infertility among Nulligravid Women
Hubacher, D., Lara-Ricalde, R., Taylor, D. J., Guerra-Infante, F., & Guzmán-Rodríguez, R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010438 · Cited by 302
Hormone withdrawal symptoms in oral contraceptive users
Sulak, P. (2000) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00524-4 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Teal, S., & Edelman, A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2021-12-28
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2507
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4200564056
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 31.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2021.21392
- The paper
- Teal, S., & Edelman, A. (2021). Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.21392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.