Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients in South Africa During the COVID-19 Omicron Wave Compared With Previous Waves

Open access
Maslo, Caroline, Friedland, Richard, Toubkin, Mande, Laubscher, Anchen, Akaloo, Teshlin, Kama, Boniswa·2022·JAMA

Abstract

On November 24, 2021, a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern, Omicron (B.1.1.529),was identified in South Africa as responsible for a fourth wave of COVID-19.1,2 The high number of spike mutations has raised concerns about its ability to evade vaccine and spread.3,4 We assessed hospitalized patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result during the fourth wave compared with previous waves.Methods | Netcare is a private health care group consisting of 49 acute care hospitals (>10 000 beds) across South Africa.South Africa has experienced 3 COVID-19 waves: (1) June to August 2020 (ancestral variant), (2) November 2020 to January 2021 (Beta), and (3) May to September 2021 (Delta).Cases again started to increase beginning November 15, 2021, coinciding with the identification of Omicron; as of December 7, 26% community positivity rates were reached.We identified the period when 26% positivity rates were reached in the previous waves (wave 1: June 14 to July 6, 2020; wave 2: December 1-23, 2020; wave 3: June 1-23, 2021) and compared them with the fourth wave (November 15 to December 7, 2021).For triage purposes, Netcare's policy is to test all admitted patients for COVID-19 with reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction or, from wave 2 onward, a rapid antigen test obtained from a nasopharyngeal swab.All patients hospitalized with a positive COVID-19 result were included.Patient characteristics, need for oxygen supply and mechanical ventilation, admission to intensive care, length of stay (LOS), and mortality rates were extracted from the electronic administration system.Follow-up was through December 20, 2021.Categorical variables were compared between waves using a χ 2 test and continuous variables using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).A 5% significance level (2-sided) was used. Analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc).This study was approved by Pharma-ethics.All patients provided written informed consent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2021.24868

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 534

Metadata

Authors
Maslo, C., Friedland, R., Toubkin, M., Laubscher, A., Akaloo, T., & Kama, B.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2022-02-08
Volume
327
Issue
6
Pages
583
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4200130025
Cited by
534
References
0
FWCI
37.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients in South Africa During the COVID-19 Omicron Wave Compared With Previous Waves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2021.24868
The paper
Maslo, C., Friedland, R., Toubkin, M., Laubscher, A., Akaloo, T., & Kama, B. (2022). Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients in South Africa During the COVID-19 Omicron Wave Compared With Previous Waves. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.24868

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.