CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 118Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Cytisine vs Varenicline on Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Courtney, Ryan J., McRobbie, Hayden, Tutka, Piotr, Weaver, Natasha A., Petrie, Dennis, Mendelsohn, Colin P., Shakeshaft, Anthony, Talukder, Saki, Macdonald, Christel, Thomas, Dennis, Kwan, Benjamin C. H., Walker, Natalie, Gartner, Coral, Mattick, Richard P., Paul, Christine, Ferguson, Stuart G., Zwar, Nicholas A., Richmond, Robyn L., Doran, Christopher M., Boland, Veronica C., Hall, Wayne, West, Robert, Farrell, Michael·2021·JAMA
DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.7621PMC PMC8261608
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Importance: Cytisine is more effective than placebo and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. However, cytisine has not been tested against the most effective smoking cessation medication, varenicline, which is associated with adverse events known to lead to discontinuation of therapy. Objective: To examine whether standard cytisine treatment (25 days) was at least as effective as standard varenicline treatment (84 days) for smoking cessation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority, open-label randomized clinical trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment was undertaken in Australia from November 2017 through May 2019; follow-up was completed in January 2020. A total of 1452 Australian adult daily smokers willing to make a quit attempt were included. Data collection was conducted primarily by computer-assisted telephone interview, but there was an in-person visit to validate the primary outcome. Interventions: Treatments were provided in accordance with the manufacturers' recommended dosage: cytisine (n = 725), 1.5-mg capsules taken 6 times daily initially then gradually reduced over the 25-day course; varenicline (n = 727), 0.5-mg tablets titrated to 1 mg twice daily for 84 days (12 weeks). All participants were offered referral to standard telephone behavioral support. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 6-month continuous abstinence verified using a carbon monoxide breath test at 7-month follow-up. The noninferiority margin was set at 5% and the 1-sided significance threshold was set at .025. Results: Among 1452 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 42.9 [12.7] years; 742 [51.1%] women), 1108 (76.3%) completed the trial. Verified 6-month continuous abstinence rates were 11.7% for the cytisine group and 13.3% for the varenicline group (risk difference, -1.62% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.02% to ∞]; P = .03 for noninferiority). Self-reported adverse events occurred less frequently in the cytisine group (997 events among 482 participants) compared with the varenicline group (1206 events among 510 participants) and the incident rate ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.95; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: Among daily smokers willing to quit, cytisine treatment for 25 days, compared with varenicline treatment for 84 days, failed to demonstrate noninferiority regarding smoking cessation. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001654448.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2021.7621

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Tutka, 2019, Cytisine for nicotine addiction treatment., Addiction, 114, 1951, 10.1111/add.v114.11 · DOI
  2. Thomas, 2019, The effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of cytisine versus varenicline for smoking cessation in an Australian population., Addiction, 114, 923, 10.1111/add.v114.5 · DOI
  3. West, 2005, Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials., Addiction, 100, 299, 10.1111/add.2005.100.issue-3 · DOI
  4. US Food and Drug Administration, 2016, Non-inferiority clinical trials to establish effectiveness; guidance for industry; availability., Fed Regist, 81, 78605

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Courtney, R. J., McRobbie, H., Tutka, P., Weaver, N. A., Petrie, D., Mendelsohn, C. P., Shakeshaft, A., Talukder, S., Macdonald, C., Thomas, D., Kwan, B. C. H., Walker, N., Gartner, C., Mattick, R. P., Paul, C., Ferguson, S. G., Zwar, N. A., Richmond, R. L., Doran, C. M., Boland, V. C., Hall, W., West, R., & Farrell, M.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Rzeszów (PL)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • No affiliation
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Bond University (AU)
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Courtney, Ryan J.
ORCID
Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2021-07-06
Volume
326
Issue
1
Pages
56
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
DOI
10.1001/jama.2021.7621
PMC
PMC8261608
OpenAlex
W3179416241
Cited by
118
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 4
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • JAMA Network Open
Funders
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Australian Government
  • University of New South Wales
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI083188)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
cytisine, varenicline, smoking cessation, non-inferiority, continuous abstinence, nicotine replacement therapy, adverse events, tobacco dependence, carbon monoxide breath test, daily smokers, treatment discontinuation, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, nicotine self-administration, nicotine sensitivity
MeSH terms
Varenicline, Smoking Cessation Agents, Quinolizidine Alkaloids, Adult, Alkaloids, Azocines, Dreams, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Quinolizines, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review