Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Priorities for a New FDA

Makary, Martin A., Prasad, Vinay·2025·JAMA

Abstract

This Viewpoint outlines new priorities of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2025.10116

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Sharma, 2025, Reviewing the safety of our foods and drugs: an urgent need for a comprehensive reevaluation by FDA of talc in the American food and drug supply., J Acad Public Health, 10.70542/rcj-japh-art-16avrw · DOI
  2. Spence, 2015, On the psychological impact of food colour., Flavour (Lond), 4, 21, 10.1186/s13411-015-0031-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Prasad, 2015, Hard-wired bias: how even double-blind, randomized controlled trials can be skewed from the start., Mayo Clin Proc, 90, 1171, 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.05.006 · DOI
  4. Wang, 2023, Emulation of randomized clinical trials with nonrandomized database analyses: results of 32 clinical trials., JAMA, 329, 1376, 10.1001/jama.2023.4221 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barosa, 2025, The cost of emulated target trials: is real-world data cheaper than randomized studies?, Eur J Clin Invest, 10.1111/eci.70035 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Makary, M. A., & Prasad, V.
Affiliations
US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
Venue
JAMA
Published
2025-08-19
Volume
334
Issue
7
Pages
565
ISSN
0098-7484
Cited by
43
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review