Cited by 20Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesBreast Lesions and CarcinomasMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Sporadic Puerperal Mastitis: An Infection That Need Not Interrupt Lactation

Marshall, Byrne R.·1975·JAMA

Abstract

Sporadic (nonepidemic) acute puerperal mastitis was diagnosed 65 times over a period of 26 months in 2.5% of mothers who elected to nurse their infants. Staphylococcus auereus was cultured from the milk of 23 of 48 infected breasts, but from only one breast of 19 normal mothers. Forty-one women with mastitis continued to nurse without difficulty for an average of 13 weeks, although mastitis recurred in four women. Three breast abscesses resulted from the 65 infections (4.6%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1975.03260130035019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshall, B. R.
Corresponding author
Marshall, Byrne R.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1975-09-29
Volume
233
Issue
13
Pages
1377
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4248249845
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Keywords
puerperal mastitis, staphylococcal mastitis, Staphylococcus aureus, breastfeeding, lactation, breast abscess, mastitis recurrence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review