The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations
Abstract
We analyzed data from the records of 422 patients with acute bacterial or viral meningitis. A cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glucose level less than 1.9 mmol/L, a CSF-blood glucose ratio less than 0.23, a CSF protein level greater than 2.2 g/L, more than 2000 x 10(6)/L CSF leukocytes, or more than 1180 x 10(6)/L CSF polymorphonuclear leukocytes were individual predictors of bacterial infection with 99% certainty or better. Although any one of these tests could rule in bacterial meningitis with high probability, none could rule it out. To better predict whether a patient has bacterial vs viral infection, we developed a logistic multiple regression model using CSF-blood glucose ratio, total polymorphonuclear leukocyte count in CSF, age, and month of onset. This proved highly reliable when validated in an independent test sample, with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97. The model should allow physicians to differentiate between acute viral and acute bacterial meningitis with greater accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Internal validation of predictive models
Steyerberg, E. W., Harrell, F. E., Borsboom, G. J. J. M., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Vergouwe, Y., & Habbema, J. D. F. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00341-9 · Cited by 2,746
Practice Guidelines for the Management of Bacterial Meningitis
Tunkel, A. R., Hartman, B. J., Kaplan, S. L., Kaufman, B. A., Roos, K. L., Scheld, W. M., & Whitley, R. J. (2004) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/425368 · Cited by 2,308
Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis
van de Beek, D., de Gans, J., Spanjaard, L., Weisfelt, M., Reitsma, J. B., & Vermeulen, M. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040845 · Cited by 1,639
Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Vergouwe, Y., & Royston, P. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b606 · Cited by 934
ESCMID guideline: diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis
van de Beek, D., Cabellos, C., Dzupova, O., Esposito, S., Klein, M., Kloek, A. T., Leib, S. L., Mourvillier, B., Ostergaard, C., Pagliano, P., et al. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.007 · Cited by 919
Metadata
- Authors
- Spanos, A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1989-11-17
- Volume
- 262
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2700
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4241091316
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.262.19.2700
- The paper
- Spanos, A. (1989). Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.262.19.2700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.