The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Use of Sedating Drugs and Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation for Respiratory Failure: A National Survey
Abstract
Objective. —To assess current use of sedating drugs and neuromuscular blocking agents in patients requiring mechanical ventilation at US hospitals that participate in the training of pulmonary fellows. Design. —Surveys were mailed in September 1990 to the head nurses of medical intensive care units at 265 US hospitals that were listed in an annual guide listing pulmonary fellowship training programs. In the survey, sedating drugs were defined as medications prescribed to treat anxiety, agitation, or sleeplessness. These included opiates, anesthetics, or neuroleptic agents when used for any of these purposes. Survey Respondents. —Surveys were received from nurses at 164 hospitals (62% response rate) representing 93 medical schools and 100 pulmonary fellowship training programs. Nearly half of the respondents worked at university hospitals. Most worked as head nurses in medical (70%) or medical-surgical (21%) intensive care units (ICUs). Results. —Sedating drugs were given to patients undergoing mechanical ventilation at virtually all the ICUs surveyed, and 36% used these drugs routinely (>70% of patients). Opiates and benzodiazepines were employed most commonly; haloperidol lactate was widely used as well. Intermittent intravenous injection was the preferred method of administration; 62% of the ICUs also gave these drugs by continuous intravenous infusion. Neuromuscular blocking agents were also used at nearly all the ICUs surveyed; however, most gave these drugs to fewer than 20% of patients experiencing respiratory failure. Orders for the use of sedating drugs and neuromuscular blocking agents were written exclusively by house staff at 65% of the ICUs surveyed. Conclusions. —Sedating drugs and neuromuscular blocking agents are widely used for patients requiring mechanical ventilation in ICUs at US teaching hospitals. There is considerable variation in the choice, frequency, and method of administration. Given the expense (up to $1000 a day) and the potential hazards to patients of prolonged deep sedation and paralysis, more research is warranted to determine optimal use of these drugs during mechanical ventilation. (JAMA. 1991;266:2870-2875)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, use of NMBA may reduce oxygen consumption by decreasing the work of breathing [464].”
From Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [464]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen-Flaschen, J. H.
- Corresponding author
- Hansen-Flaschen, John H.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1991-11-27
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2870
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4296766430
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- neuromuscular blocking agents, mechanical ventilation, respiratory failure, intensive care unit, opiates, benzodiazepines, haloperidol, deep sedation, paralysis, teaching hospitals, nursing practice patterns, drug administration methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review