The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine why and how sedatives and analgesics are ordered and administered during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care units at a county hospital and a university hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive 1-year sample of 22 patients from whom life support was withheld or withdrawn in one intensive care unit at a county hospital and a random sample of 22 similar patients in the intensive care unit in the university hospital over the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physicians and nurses were interviewed to determine their reasons for ordering and administering drugs, and medical records were reviewed to document amounts of drugs ordered and administered. RESULTS: Drugs were given to 75% of patients during withholding and withdrawal of life support. Patients who did not receive medication were comatose and considered incapable of benefiting from sedation and analgesia. The median time until death following the initiation of the withholding or withdrawal of life support was 3.5 hours in the patients who received drugs and 1.3 hours in those patients who did not (P, not significant). Physicians ordered drugs to decrease pain in 88% of patients, to decrease anxiety in 85%, to decrease air hunger in 76%, to comfort families in 82%, and to hasten death in 39%; in no instance was hastening death the only reason cited. The amounts of benzodiazepines and opiates averaged 2.2 mg/h of diazepam and 3.3 mg/h of morphine sulfate in the 24 hours before withholding and withdrawal of life support and 9.8 mg/h and 11.2 mg/h in the 24 hours thereafter (P less than .025 and P less than .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Large doses of sedatives and analgesics were ordered primarily to relieve pain and suffering during the withholding and withdrawal of life support, and death was not hastened by drug administration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Girard, T. D., Kress, J. P., Fuchs, B. D., Thomason, J. W., Schweickert, W. D., Pun, B. T., Taichman, D. B., Dunn, J. G., Pohlman, A. S., Kinniry, P. A., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60105-1 · Cited by 2,055
Needham, D. M., Korupolu, R., Zanni, J. M., Pradhan, P., Colantuoni, E., Palmer, J. B., Brower, R. G., & Fan, E. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.002 · Cited by 731
Physical Complications in Acute Lung Injury Survivors: A Two-Year Longitudinal Prospective Study
Fan, E., Dowdy, D. W., Colantuoni, E., Mendez-Tellez, P. A., Sevransky, J. E., Shanholtz, C., Dennison Himmelfarb, C. R., Desai, S. V., Ciesla, N., Herridge, M. S., et al. (2014) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000000040 · Cited by 615
An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill
Lilly, C. M., De Meo, D. L., Sonna, L. A., Haley, K. J., Massaro, A. F., Wallace, R. F., & Cody, S. (2000) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00524-6 · Cited by 508
Randolph, A. G. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.20.2561 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, W. C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1992-02-19
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 949-953
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4254452370
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.267.7.949
- The paper
- Wilson, W. C. (1992). Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.7.949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.