The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
White blood cell count and cardiovascular disease. Insights from the Framingham Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation of white blood cell (WBC) count to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, and cardiac failure. Traditional CVD risk factors, hematocrit, and vital capacity were considered. DESIGN: Prospective cohort analysis with one baseline examination of relevant risk factors and 12 years of follow-up for CVD. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A community-based sample (Farmingham Offspring Study) of 1393 men and 1401 women who were free of CVD at the onset of the study and who were between the ages of 30 and 59 years at baseline. Time-dependent multiple variable logistic regression methods were used. RESULTS: There were 180 CVD events in men and 80 in women. The WBC count was correlated most strongly with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, hematocrit, and vital capacity. Among nonsmoking men with WBC counts within the normal range, the age-adjusted WBC count was significantly associated with CVD and coronary heart disease incidence. For each 1.0 x 10(9)/L-cell difference in WBC count, the CVD risk increased 32%. In women, each 1.0 x 10(9)/L-cell increment in WBC count was associated with a 17% increase in CVD risk, but only in smokers, and the relationship was not statistically significant after adjustment for relevant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of elevation of WBC count within the normal range is a marker for increased risk of CVD that is partially explained by cigarette smoking. Future studies should include differential WBC determinations to assess their association with CVD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
de Lorgeril, M., Salen, P., Martin, J.-L., Monjaud, I., Delaye, J., & Mamelle, N. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.6.779 · Cited by 2,910
Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and outcome from coronary artery bypass grafting
Gibson, P. H., Croal, B. L., Cuthbertson, B. H., Small, G. R., Ifezulike, A. I., Gibson, G., Jeffrey, R. R., Buchan, K. G., El-Shafei, H., & Hillis, G. S. (2007) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.043 · Cited by 382
The evolving role of inflammation in obesity and the metabolic syndrome
Lee, Y.-H., & Pratley, R. E. (2005) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-005-0071-7 · Cited by 369
FROHLICH, M. (2003) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00260-4 · Cited by 294
Leukocytosis and Ischemic Vascular Disease Morbidity and Mortality: Is It Time to Intervene?
Coller, B. S. (2005) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.0000156877.94472.a5 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Kannel, W. B.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1992-03-04
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1253-1256
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4229951948
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: White blood cell count and cardiovascular disease. Insights from the Framingham Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.267.9.1253
- The paper
- Kannel, W. B. (1992). White blood cell count and cardiovascular disease. Insights from the Framingham Study. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.9.1253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.