Cited by 136Global Health Workforce IssuesDiversity and Career in MedicineHealthcare Policy and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

The Comparative Retention of National Health Service Corps and Other Rural Physicians: Results of a 9-Year Follow-up Study

Pathman, Donald E.·1992·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To contrast the retention of physicians serving National Health Service Corps (NHSC) Scholarship Program obligations in rural settings to that of non-NHSC physicians working in the same or similar practices, and to identify promising retention-enhancing strategies. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred twelve primary care physicians initially identified during an earlier study as working in a national stratified random sample of 178 externally subsidized rural clinics in 1981. Thirty-six percent were serving obligations to the NHSC, nearly all through the NHSC's Scholarship Program. The NHSC and non-NHSC inception cohorts (those first coming to their 1981 [or "index"] practices from May 1979 through December 1981) were created from within the entire group for use in most analyses. INTERVENTION: In 1990, physicians were resurveyed to learn of their backgrounds, experiences in their index practices, and their subsequent career moves. RESULTS: By 1984 and in each year thereafter, fewer NHSC than non-NHSC physicians of the entire respondent cohort remained (1) in their index practices, (2) in their index communities, and (3) in practice in any rural county (P less than .001). In the inception cohort, fewer NHSC than non-NHSC physicians were retained within all three settings by the third year after their initial dates of employment (P less than or equal to .01). After 8 years of employment, group retention rates for NHSC and non-NHSC inception cohort physici…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1992.03490120066030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pathman et al. found in a 9-year follow-up study that doctors contracted into rural service in the USA as compensation for education costs did not remain longer than their required service obligations.

    “Pathman et al., [25] in a 9-year follow-up study of doctors in the National Health Corps in the USA, found that those who were contracted into service in rural areas as compensation for the payment of their education costs, did not remain longer than their required service obligations.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pathman, D. E.
Corresponding author
Pathman, Donald E.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1992-09-23
Volume
268
Issue
12
Pages
1552
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4239250286
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
18.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1-RO1-HS06544-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
physician retention, National Health Service Corps, rural health workforce, rural clinics
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Career Mobility, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal Medicine, Male, Medically Underserved Area, Pediatrics, Physicians, Physicians, Family, Professional Practice Location, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Health, Training Support, United States, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review