The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To define the characteristics of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in a population of healthy men without clinically evident prostate cancer, but who are at risk for developing the malignancy. The influence of patient age and prostatic size on the serum PSA concentration was assessed in order to use PSA more appropriately to detect clinically significant prostate cancer at an early, potentially curable stage. DESIGN: Prospective, community-based study. PARTICIPANTS: Between December 1989 and March 1991, 2119 healthy men aged 40 to 79 years from Olmsted County, Minnesota, were entered into a prospective study to assess the natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Of these, 537 (25%) were randomly chosen to participate in a detailed clinical examination that included a serum PSA determination (Tandem-R PSA assay), digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasonography. Four hundred seventy-one (88%) completed the prostatic evaluation and had no evidence of prostate cancer by any of these three diagnostic tests; these men formed the study population on which all analyses were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Serum PSA concentration, prostatic volume, and PSA density (serum PSA level/prostatic volume) as a function of patient age. RESULTS: The serum PSA concentration is correlated with patient age (r = .43; P < .0001) and prostatic volume (r = .55; P < .0001). Prostatic volume, in turn, is directly correlated with patient age (r = .43; P < .0001), whereas the PSA density value is only weakly correlated with patient age (r = .25; P < .001). For a healthy 60-year-old man with no evidence of prostate cancer, the serum PSA concentration increases by approximately 3.2% per year (0.04 ng/mL per year). The recommended reference range for serum PSA (95th percentile) for men aged 40 to 49 years is 0.0 to 2.5 ng/mL; for 50 to 59 years, 0.0 to 3.5 ng/mL; 60 to 69 years, 0.0 to 4.5 ng/mL; and 70 to 79 years, 0.0 to 6.5 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The serum PSA concentration is directly correlated with patient age and prostatic volume, the latter of which also is directly related to age. Thus, rather than rely on a single reference range for men of all age groups, it is more appropriate to have age-specific reference ranges. These age-specific reference ranges have the potential to make serum PSA a more discriminating tumor marker for detecting clinically significant cancers in older men (increasing specificity) and to find more potentially curable cancers in younger men (increasing sensitivity).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework
Cook, D. A., Brydges, R., Ginsburg, S., & Hatala, R. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12678 · Cited by 554
Prevalence of delayed clinician response to elevated prostate-specific antigen values
Nepple, K. G., Joudi, F. N., Hillis, S. L., & Wahls, T. L. (2008) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/83.4.439 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Oesterling, J. E.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1993-08-18
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 860-864
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4252086282
- Cited by
- 1,266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 61.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.