The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Physicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It is controversial whether physicians' interactions with drug companies affect their behavior. To test the null hypothesis, that such interactions are not associated with physician behavior, we studied one behavior: requesting that a drug be added to a hospital formulary. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Full-time attending physicians. Case physicians were all 40 physicians who requested a formulary addition from January 1989 through October 1990. Control physicians were 80 randomly selected physicians who had not made requests. MAIN EXPOSURE MEASURE: Physician interactions with drug companies, as determined by survey of physicians (response rate, 88% [105/120]). RESULTS: Physicians who had requested that drugs be added to the formulary interacted with drug companies more often than other physicians; for example, they were more likely to have accepted money from companies to attend or speak at educational symposia or to perform research (odds ratio [OR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 13.2). Furthermore, physicians were more likely than other physicians to have requested that drugs manufactured by specific companies be added to the formulary if they had met with pharmaceutical representatives from those companies (OR, 13.2; 95% CI, 4.8 to 36.3) or had accepted money from those companies (OR, 19.2; 95% CI, 2.3 to 156.9). These associations were consistent in multivariable analyses controlling for potentially confounding factors. Moreover, physicians were more likely to have requested formulary additions made by the companies whose pharmaceutical representatives they had met (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.2 to 7.4) or from whom they had accepted money (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.7) than they were to have requested drugs made by other companies. CONCLUSION: Requests by physicians that drugs be added to a hospital formulary were strongly and specifically associated with the physicians' interactions with the companies manufacturing the drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brennan, T. A., Rothman, D. J., Blank, L., Blumenthal, D., Chimonas, S. C., Cohen, J. J., Goldman, J., Kassirer, J. P., Kimball, H., Naughton, J., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.4.429 · Cited by 695
Conflict of Interest in the Debate over Calcium-Channel Antagonists
Stelfox, H. T., Chua, G., O'Rourke, K., & Detsky, A. S. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801083380206 · Cited by 615
Spurling, G. K., Mansfield, P. R., Montgomery, B. D., Lexchin, J., Doust, J., Othman, N., & Vitry, A. I. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000352 · Cited by 526
DeJong, C., Aguilar, T., Tseng, C.-W., Lin, G. A., Boscardin, W. J., & Dudley, R. A. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2765 · Cited by 517
Katz, D., Caplan, A. L., & Merz, J. F. (2010) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2010.519226 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Chren, M. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1994-03-02
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 684-689
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4231635406
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.271.9.684
- The paper
- Chren, M. M. (1994). Physicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.271.9.684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.