Cited by 642Mental Health Treatment and AccessAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Common Mental Disorders and Disability Across Cultures: Results From the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care

Ormel, Johan·1994·JAMA

Abstract

Objective. —To examine the impact of common mental illness on functional disability and the cross-cultural consistency of this relationship while controlling for physical illness. A secondary objective was to determine the level of disability associated with specific psychiatric disorders. Design. —A cross-sectional sample selected by two-stage sampling. Setting. —Primary health care facilities in 14 countries covering most major cultures and languages. Patients. —A total of 25916 consecutive attenders of these facilities were screened for psychopathology using the General Health Questionnaire (96% response). Screened patients were sampled from the General Health Questionnaire score strata for the second-stage Composite International Diagnostic Interview administered to 5447 patients (62% response). Main Outcome Measures. —Patient-reported physical disability, number of disability days, and interviewer-rated occupational role functioning. Results. —After controlling for physical disease severity, psychopathology was consistently associated with increased disability. Physical disease severity was an independent, although weaker, contributor to disability. A dose-response relationship was found between severity of mental illness and disability. Disability was most prominent among patients with major depression, panic disorder, generalized anxiety, and neurasthenia; disorder-specific differences were modest after controlling for psychiatric comorbidity. Results were consistent across disability measures and across centers. Conclusions. —The consistent relationship of psychopathology and disability indicates the compelling personal and socioeconomic impact of common mental illnesses across cultures. This suggests the importance of impairments of higher-order human capacities (eg, emotion, motivation, and cognition) as determinants of functional disability. (JAMA. 1994;272:1741-1748)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1994.03520220035028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 642

Metadata

Authors
Ormel, J.
Corresponding author
Ormel, Johan
Venue
JAMA
Published
1994-12-14
Volume
272
Issue
22
Pages
1741
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4206621253
Cited by
642
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 22
FWCI
15.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
common mental disorders, functional disability, cross-cultural consistency, psychopathology, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, neurasthenia, psychiatric comorbidity, disability days, primary care, socio-economic impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common Mental Disorders and Disability Across Cultures: Results From the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1994.03520220035028
The paper
Ormel, J. (1994). Common Mental Disorders and Disability Across Cultures: Results From the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520220035028