The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Rotavirus Immunization Program for the United States
Abstract
CONTEXT: Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in children, and a live, oral vaccine may soon be licensed for prevention. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic impact of a national rotavirus immunization program in the United States. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness was analyzed from the perspectives of the health care system and society. A decision tree used estimates of disease burden, costs, vaccine coverage, efficacy, and price obtained from published and unpublished sources. INTERVENTION: The proposed vaccine would be administered to infants at ages 2, 4, and 6 months as part of the routine schedule of childhood immunizations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs, outcomes prevented, and incremental cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: A routine, universal rotavirus immunization program would prevent 1.08 million cases of diarrhea, avoiding 34000 hospitalizations, 95000 emergency department visits, and 227000 physician visits in the first 5 years of life. At $20 per dose, the program would cost $289 million and realize a net loss of $107 million to the health care system-$103 per case prevented. The program would provide a net savings of $296 million to society. Threshold analysis identified a break-even price per dose of $9 for the health care system and $51 for the societal perspective. Greater disease burden and greater vaccine efficacy and lower vaccine price increased cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: A US rotavirus immunization program would be cost-effective from the perspectives of society and the health care system, although the cost of the immunization program would not be fully offset by the reduction in health care cost of rotavirus diarrhea unless the price fell to $9 per dose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soumerai, S. B., McLaughlin, T. J., Gurwitz, J. H., Guadagnoli, E., Hauptman, P. J., Borbas, C., Morris, N., McLaughlin, B., Gao, X., Willison, D. J., et al. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.17.1358 · Cited by 479
The Burden and Etiology of Diarrheal Illness in Developing Countries.
Kotloff, K. L. (2017) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2017.03.006 · Cited by 270
Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Strategy to Vaccinate Healthy Working Adults Against Influenza
Nichol, K. L. (2001) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.161.5.749 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucker, A. W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-05-06
- Volume
- 279
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1371
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2121496714
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Rotavirus Immunization Program for the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.279.17.1371
- The paper
- Tucker, A. W. (1998). Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Rotavirus Immunization Program for the United States. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.17.1371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.