The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competing Risk Analysis of Men Aged 55 to 74 Years at Diagnosis Managed Conservatively for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
Abstract
CONTEXT: The appropriate therapy for men with localized prostate cancer is uncertain. Until results of clinical trials are available, men and their physicians need guidance. OBJECTIVE: To estimate survival based on a competing risk analysis stratified by age at diagnosis and histologic findings for men diagnosed as having clinically localized prostate cancer and who were managed conservatively. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Connecticut Tumor Registry. PATIENTS: A total of 767 men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed between 1971 and 1984, aged 55 to 74 years at diagnosis, either not treated or treated with immediate or delayed hormonal therapy, and followed up for 10 to 20 years after diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimates of the probability of dying from prostate cancer or other competing hazards. RESULTS: Men with tumors that have Gleason scores of 2 to 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 to 10 face a 4% to 7%, 6% to 11%, 18% to 30%, 42% to 70%, and 60% to 87% chance, respectively, of dying from prostate cancer within 15 years of diagnosis depending on their age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Men whose prostate biopsy specimens show Gleason score 2 to 4 disease face a minimal risk of death from prostate cancer within 15 years of diagnosis. Conversely, men whose biopsy specimens show Gleason score 7 to 10 disease face a high risk of death from prostate cancer when treated conservatively, even when cancer is diagnosed as late as age 74 years. Men with Gleason score 5 or 6 tumors face a modest risk of death from prostate cancer that increases slowly over at least 15 years of follow-up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Controlled Trial of Leuprolide with and without Flutamide in Prostatic Carcinoma
Crawford, E. D., Eisenberger, M. A., McLeod, D. G., Spaulding, J. T., Benson, R., Dorr, F. A., Blumenstein, B. A., Davis, M. A., & Goodman, P. J. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198908173210702 · Cited by 1,464
Cited by
CANCER CONTROL WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ALONE IN 1,000 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS
HULL, G. W., RABBANI, F., ABBAS, F., WHEELER, T. M., KATTAN, M. W., & SCARDINO, P. T. (2002) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)69079-7 · Cited by 964
Kirby, M., Hirst, C., & Crawford, E. D. (2011) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02799.x · Cited by 861
Zhou, C. K., Check, D. P., Lortet‐Tieulent, J., Laversanne, M., Jemal, A., Ferlay, J., Bray, F., Cook, M. B., & Devesa, S. S. (2016) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.29894 · Cited by 322
on behalf of the Transatlantic Prostate Group, Cuzick, J., Stone, S., Fisher, G., Yang, Z. H., North, B. V., Berney, D. M., Beltran, L., Greenberg, D., Møller, H., et al. (2015) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.223 · Cited by 155
Gelenberg, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Rush, A. J., Thase, M. E., Howland, R., Klein, D. N., Kornstein, S. G., Dunner, D. L., Markowitz, J. C., Hirschfeld, R. M. A., et al. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01971-6 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Albertsen, P. C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-09-16
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 975
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2156776019
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competing Risk Analysis of Men Aged 55 to 74 Years at Diagnosis Managed Conservatively for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.280.11.975
- The paper
- Albertsen, P. C. (1998). Competing Risk Analysis of Men Aged 55 to 74 Years at Diagnosis Managed Conservatively for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.11.975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.