The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Class Restriction of Cephalosporin Use to Control Total Cephalosporin Resistance in Nosocomial <EMPH TYPE="ITAL">Klebsiella</EMPH>
Abstract
CONTEXT: Resistance to most or all cephalosporin antibiotics in Klebsiella species has developed in many European and North American hospitals during the past 2 decades. OBJECTIVE: To determine if restriction of use of the cephalosporin class of antibiotics would reduce the incidence of patient infection or colonization by cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella. DESIGN: A before-after comparative 2-year trial. SETTING: A 500-bed, university-affiliated community hospital in Queens, NY. PATIENTS: All adult medical and surgical hospital inpatients. INTERVENTION: A new antibiotic guideline excluded the use of cephalosporins except for pediatric infection, single-dose surgical prophylaxis, acute bacterial meningitis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and outpatient gonococcal infection. All other cephalosporin use required prior approval by the infectious disease section. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of patient infection or colonization by ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella during 1995 (control period) compared with 1996 (intervention period). RESULTS: An 80.1% reduction in hospital-wide cephalosporin use occurred in 1996 compared with 1995. This was accompanied by a 44.0% reduction in the incidence of ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella infection and colonization throughout the medical center (P<.01), a 70.9% reduction within all intensive care units (P<.001), and an 87.5% reduction within the surgical intensive care unit (P<.001). A concomitant 68.7% increase in the incidence of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa occurred throughout the medical center (P<.01). All such isolates except one were susceptible to other antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Extensive cephalosporin class restriction significantly reduced nosocomial, plasmid-mediated, cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella infection and colonization. This occurred at the price of increased imipenem resistance in P aeruginosa, which remained susceptible to other agents. Thus, an overall reduction in multiply-resistant pathogens was achieved within 1 year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Combating Antimicrobial Resistance: Policy Recommendations to Save Lives
Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir153 · Cited by 733
Landman, D., Quale, J. M., Mayorga, D., Adedeji, A., Vangala, K., Ravishankar, J., Flores, C., & Brooks, S. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.13.1515 · Cited by 301
(2021) · doi:10.3322/caac.21697 · Cited by 201
Pierce, J., Apisarnthanarak, A., Schellack, N., Cornistein, W., Maani, A. A., Adnan, S., & Stevens, M. P. (2020) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.126 · Cited by 154
β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: From Then to Now
Toussaint, K. A., & Gallagher, J. C. (2015) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1177/1060028014556652 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahal, J. J.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-10-14
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1233
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2109481306
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Class Restriction of Cephalosporin Use to Control Total Cephalosporin Resistance in Nosocomial <EMPH TYPE="ITAL">Klebsiella</EMPH>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.280.14.1233
- The paper
- Rahal, J. J. (1998). Class Restriction of Cephalosporin Use to Control Total Cephalosporin Resistance in Nosocomial <EMPH TYPE="ITAL">Klebsiella</EMPH>. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.14.1233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.