The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine in Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Trial
Abstract
CONTEXT: Data are limited and conflicting regarding the effectiveness of influenza vaccine in health care professionals. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of trivalent influenza vaccine in reducing infection, illness, and absence from work in young, healthy health care professionals. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind, controlled trial over 3 consecutive years, from 1992-1993 to 1994-1995. SETTING: Two large teaching hospitals in Baltimore, Md. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred sixty-four hospital-based health care professionals without chronic medical problems were recruited; 49 participated for 2 seasons; 24 participated for 3 seasons. The mean age was 28.4 years, 75% were resident physicians, and 57% were women. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either an influenza vaccine or a control (meningococcal vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, or placebo). Serum samples for antibody assays were collected at the time of vaccination, 1 month after vaccination, and at the end of the influenza season. Active weekly surveillance for illness was conducted during each influenza epidemic period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serologically defined influenza infection (4-fold increase in hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies), days of febrile respiratory illness, and days absent from work. RESULTS: We conducted 359 person-winters of serologic surveillance (99.4% follow-up) and 4746 person-weeks of illness surveillance (100% follow-up). Twenty-four(13.4%) of 179 control subjects and 3 (1.7%) of 180 influenza vaccine recipients had serologic evidence of influenza type A or B infection during the study period. Vaccine efficacy against serologically defined infection was 88% for influenza A (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-97%; P=.001) and 89% for influenza B (95% CI, 14%-99%; P=.03). Among influenza vaccinees, cumulative days of reported febrile respiratory illness were 28.7 per 100 subjects compared with 40.6 per 100 subjects in controls (P=.57) and days of absence were 9.9 per 100 subjects vs 21.1 per 100 subjects in controls (P=.41). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccine is effective in preventing infection by influenza A and B in health care professionals and may reduce reported days of work absence and febrile respiratory illness. These data support a policy of annual influenza vaccination of health care professionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Complications of Viral Influenza
Rothberg, M. B., Haessler, S. D., & Brown, R. B. (2008) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.10.040 · Cited by 456
Influenza in the acute hospital setting
Salgado, C. D., Farr, B. M., Hall, K. K., & Hayden, F. G. (2002) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00221-9 · Cited by 417
Nichol, K. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.2.137 · Cited by 402
Effectiveness of surgical masks against influenza bioaerosols
Makison Booth, C., Clayton, M., Crook, B., & Gawn, J. M. (2013) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2013.02.007 · Cited by 132
Looijmans-van den Akker, I., van Delden, J. J. M., Verheij, T. J. M., van der Sande, M. A. B., van Essen, G. A., Riphagen-Dalhuisen, J., Hulscher, M. E., & Hak, E. (2010) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.05.003 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilde, J. A., McMillan, J. A., Serwint, J., Butta, J., O'Riordan, M. A., & Steinhoff, M. C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-03-10
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 908
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2093025410
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine in Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.281.10.908
- The paper
- Wilde, J. A., McMillan, J. A., Serwint, J., Butta, J., O'Riordan, M. A., & Steinhoff, M. C. (1999). Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine in Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.10.908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.