The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Long-term Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (RTOG 85-01)
Abstract
CONTEXT: Carcinoma of the esophagus traditionally has been treated by surgery or radiation therapy (RT), but 5-year overall survival rates have been only 5% to 10%. We previously reported results of a study conducted from January 1986 to April 1990 of combined chemotherapy and RT vs RT alone when an interim analysis revealed significant benefit for combined therapy. OBJECTIVE: To report the long-term outcomes of a previously reported trial designed to determine if adding chemotherapy during RT improves the survival rate of patients with esophageal carcinoma. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted 1985 to 1990 with follow-up of at least 5 years, followed by a prospective cohort study conducted between May 1990 and April 1991. SETTING: Multi-institution participation, ranging from tertiary academic referral centers to general community practices. PATIENTS: Patients had squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, T1-3 N0-1 M0, adequate renal and bone marrow reserve, and a Karnofsky score of at least 50. Interventions Combined modality therapy (n = 134): 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, plus cisplatin intravenously on the first day of weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11, and fluorouracil, 1 g/m2 per day by continuous infusion on the first 4 days of weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11. In the randomized study, combined therapy was compared with RT only (n = 62): 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6.4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, patterns of failure, and toxic effects. RESULTS: Combined therapy significantly increased overall survival compared with RT alone. In the randomized part of the trial, at 5 years of follow-up the overall survival for combined therapy was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-37%) compared with 0% following RT. In the succeeding nonrandomized part, combined therapy produced a 5-year overall survival of 14% (95% CI, 6%-23%). Persistence of disease (despite therapy) was the most common mode of treatment failure; however, it was less common in the groups receiving combined therapy (34/130 [26%]) than in the group treated with RT only (23/62 [37%]). Severe acute toxic effects also were greater in the combined therapy groups. There were no significant differences in severe late toxic effects between the groups. However, chemotherapy could be administered as planned in only 89 (68%) of 130 patients (10% had life-threatening toxic effects with combined therapy vs 2% in the RT only group). CONCLUSION: Combined therapy increases the survival of patients who have squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, T1-3 N0-1 M0, compared with RT alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127
Cited by
Pennathur, A., Gibson, M. K., Jobe, B. A., & Luketich, J. D. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60643-6 · Cited by 2,390
Stahl, M., Stuschke, M., Lehmann, N., Meyer, H.-J., Walz, M. K., Seeber, S., Klump, B., Budach, W., Teichmann, R., Schmitt, M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.00.034 · Cited by 1,314
Kato, K., Muro, K., Minashi, K., Ohtsu, A., Ishikura, S., Boku, N., Takiuchi, H., Komatsu, Y., Miyata, Y., & Fukuda, H. (2011) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.033 · Cited by 353
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers
Ajani, J. A., Barthel, J. S., Bentrem, D. J., D'Amico, T. A., Das, P., Denlinger, C. S., Fuchs, C. S., Gerdes, H., Glasgow, R. E., Hayman, J. A., et al. (2011) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2011.0072 · Cited by 331
Esophageal carcinoma: Towards targeted therapies
Fatehi Hassanabad, A., Chehade, R., Breadner, D., & Raphael, J. (2020) · Cellular Oncology · doi:10.1007/s13402-019-00488-2 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, J. S., Guo, M. D., Herskovic, A., Macdonald, J. S., Martenson, Jr., Al-Sarraf, M., Byhardt, R., Russell, A. H., Beitler, J. J., Spencer, S., Asbell, S. O., Graham, M. V., & Leichman, L. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-05-05
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1623-7
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2144263975
- Cited by
- 1,957
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Long-term Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (RTOG 85-01). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.281.17.1623
- The paper
- Cooper, J. S., Guo, M. D., Herskovic, A., Macdonald, J. S., Martenson, Jr., Al-Sarraf, M., Byhardt, R., Russell, A. H., Beitler, J. J., Spencer, S., Asbell, S. O., Graham, M. V., & Leichman, L. L. (1999). Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Long-term Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (RTOG 85-01). JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.17.1623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.