CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 154Bacterial Infections and VaccinesMicrobial infections and disease researchNeonatal and Maternal Infections

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk of Meningococcal Infection in College Students

Harrison, Lee H.·1999·JAMA
DOI 10.1001/jama.281.20.1906
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

CONTEXT: The number of meningococcal outbreaks on college campuses have been increasing in the past few years. However, no published studies have documented the incidence of invasive meningococcal infection in college students or whether the incidence is higher than in the general population of the same age. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of invasive meningococcal infection in Maryland college students with that of the general population of the same age. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Maryland residents with meningococcal infection from 1992-1997 identified from active, laboratory-based, statewide surveillance for invasive meningococcal disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of invasive meningococcal infection. RESULTS: Of 228 patients with invasive meningococcal infection, 67 were aged 16 to 30 years; 11 and 3 of these attended Maryland 4- and 2-year colleges, respectively. Of these, 12 (86%) had infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroups included in the current meningococcal vaccine. The average annual incidence was 1.74 per 100000 among students in 4-year schools vs 1.44 per 100000 for the general population of the same age (P=.60). Among students in 4-year schools, the incidence was 3.24 per 100000 in on-campus residents vs 0.96 per 100000 in off-campus residents (relative risk, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-11.6; P=.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of meningococcal infection in college students is similar to the incidence in the general population of the same age, but college students residing on campus appear to be at higher risk than those residing off campus.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.281.20.1906

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–151 of 151

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Harrison, L. H.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Harrison, Lee H.
ORCID
Harrison, Lee H.
Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
1999-05-26
Volume
281
Issue
20
Pages
1906
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
DOI
10.1001/jama.281.20.1906
OpenAlex
W1966959397
Cited by
154
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
invasive meningococcal disease, Neisseria meningitidis, university students, on-campus residence, disease surveillance, Maryland
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Housing, Humans, Maryland, Meningococcal Infections, Neisseria meningitidis, Population Surveillance, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Students, Universities, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review