The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidental Findings on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging From 1000 Asymptomatic Volunteers
Abstract
CONTEXT: Previous reports have discussed incidental disease found on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that had been requested for an unrelated clinical concern or symptom, resulting in a selection bias for disease. However, the prevalence of unexpected abnormalities has not been studied in a healthy population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of incidental findings on brain MRI scans obtained for a healthy, asymptomatic population without selection bias. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of brain MRI scans obtained between May 17, 1996, and July 25, 1997, from 1000 volunteers who participated as control subjects for various research protocols at the National Institutes of Health. All participants (age range, 3-83 years; 54.6% male) were determined to be healthy and asymptomatic by physician examination and participant history. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence of abnormalities on brain MRI by category of finding (no referral necessary, routine referral, urgent referral [within 1 week of study], and immediate referral [within 1 to several days of study]). RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of the MRI results were normal. Of the 18% demonstrating incidental abnormal findings, 15.1% required no referral; 1.8%, routine referral; 1.1%, urgent referral; and 0%, immediate referral. In subjects grouped for urgent referral, 2 confirmed primary brain tumors (and a possible but unconfirmed third) were found, demonstrating a prevalence of at least 0.2%. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic subjects present with a variety of abnormalities, providing valuable information on disease prevalence in a presumed healthy population. A small percentage of these findings require urgent medical attention and/or additional studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Al-Shahi, R., Bhattacharya, J. J., Currie, D. G., Papanastassiou, V., Ritchie, V., Roberts, R. C., Sellar, R. J., & Warlow, C. P. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000069018.90456.c9 · Cited by 451
Sandeman, E. M., Hernandez, M. D. C. V., Morris, Z., Bastin, M. E., Murray, C., Gow, A. J., Corley, J., Henderson, R., Deary, I. J., Starr, J. M., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071467 · Cited by 61
Lane, N. M., Hunter, S. A., & Lawrie, S. M. (2020) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102228 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Katzman, G. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-07-07
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2076953252
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidental Findings on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging From 1000 Asymptomatic Volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.282.1.36
- The paper
- Katzman, G. L. (1999). Incidental Findings on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging From 1000 Asymptomatic Volunteers. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.1.36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.