Cited by 540Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

HPV DNA Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening: Results From Women in a High-Risk Province of Costa Rica

Schiffman, Mark, Herrero, Rolando, Hildesheim, Allan, Sherman, Mark E., Bratti, Maria, Wacholder, Sholom, Alfaro, Mario, Hutchinson, Martha +3 more·2000·JAMA

Abstract

Context Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are known to cause most cervical cancer worldwide, but the utility of HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer prevention has not been determined. Objective To provide comprehensive data on the screening performance of HPV testing for the most common carcinogenic types, at different levels of analytic sensitivity. Design Laboratory analysis conducted during 1993-1995, using 3 cytologic techniques and cervicography, followed by colposcopic examination of women with any abnormal cervical finding, to detect all high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cancer (reference standard of clinically significant disease). The HPV testing was performed subsequently with masking regarding clinical findings. Setting Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica, a region with a high age-adjusted incidence of cervical cancer. Participants Of 11742 randomly selected women, 8554 nonpregnant, sexually active women without hysterectomies underwent initial HPV DNA testing using the original Hybrid Capture Tube test; a stratified subsample of 1119 specimens was retested using the more analytically sensitive second generation assay, the Hybrid Capture II test. Main outcome measures Receiver operating characteristic analysis of detection of cervical high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cancer by HPV DNA testing based on different cut points of positivity. Results An analytic sensitivity of 1.0 pg/mL using the second generation assay would have permitted detection of 88.4% of 138 hi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.283.1.87

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 540

Authors
Schiffman, M., Herrero, R., Hildesheim, A., Sherman, M. E., Bratti, M., Wacholder, S., Alfaro, M., Hutchinson, M., Morales, J., Greenberg, M. D., & Lorincz, A. T.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Costa Rican Department of Social Security (CR)
  • Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2000-01-05
Volume
283
Issue
1
Pages
87
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2147235018
Cited by
540
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
48.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
HPV testing, cervical cancer screening, Hybrid Capture 2, hybridization capture, cervical cancer, analytical sensitivity, detection threshold, Pap smear, screening specificity, Costa Rica, Guanacaste, cervical cancer prevention, ASCUS
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, Costa Rica, DNA, Viral, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tumor Virus Infections, Vaginal Smears, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review