HPV DNA Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening: Results From Women in a High-Risk Province of Costa Rica
Abstract
Context Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are known to cause most cervical cancer worldwide, but the utility of HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer prevention has not been determined. Objective To provide comprehensive data on the screening performance of HPV testing for the most common carcinogenic types, at different levels of analytic sensitivity. Design Laboratory analysis conducted during 1993-1995, using 3 cytologic techniques and cervicography, followed by colposcopic examination of women with any abnormal cervical finding, to detect all high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cancer (reference standard of clinically significant disease). The HPV testing was performed subsequently with masking regarding clinical findings. Setting Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica, a region with a high age-adjusted incidence of cervical cancer. Participants Of 11742 randomly selected women, 8554 nonpregnant, sexually active women without hysterectomies underwent initial HPV DNA testing using the original Hybrid Capture Tube test; a stratified subsample of 1119 specimens was retested using the more analytically sensitive second generation assay, the Hybrid Capture II test. Main outcome measures Receiver operating characteristic analysis of detection of cervical high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cancer by HPV DNA testing based on different cut points of positivity. Results An analytic sensitivity of 1.0 pg/mL using the second generation assay would have permitted detection of 88.4% of 138 hi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology at identifying CIN2/3 lesions but with lower specificity.
“Studies, particularly in developed countries, suggest that HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology at identifying CIN 2=3 lesions but with lower specificity.10,[20][21][22][23][24][25]”
From A cluster randomized controlled trial of visual, cytology and human papillomavirus screening for cancer of the cervix in rural India (2005) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 540
- Authors
- Schiffman, M., Herrero, R., Hildesheim, A., Sherman, M. E., Bratti, M., Wacholder, S., Alfaro, M., Hutchinson, M., Morales, J., Greenberg, M. D., & Lorincz, A. T.
- Affiliations
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Costa Rican Department of Social Security (CR)
- Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (US)
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-01-05
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2147235018
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 48.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- HPV testing, cervical cancer screening, Hybrid Capture 2, hybridization capture, cervical cancer, analytical sensitivity, detection threshold, Pap smear, screening specificity, Costa Rica, Guanacaste, cervical cancer prevention, ASCUS
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, Costa Rica, DNA, Viral, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tumor Virus Infections, Vaginal Smears, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Papanicolaou Test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review