The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monitoring Osteoporosis Therapy With Bone Densitometry<SUBTITLE>Misleading Changes and Regression to the Mean</SUBTITLE>
Abstract
CONTEXT: The principle of "regression to the mean" predicts that patients with unusual responses to treatment might represent outliers who are likely to have more typical responses if treatment is continued without change. OBJECTIVE: To test whether women who lose bone mineral density (BMD) during the first year of treatment for osteoporosis continue to lose BMD if the same treatment is continued beyond 1 year. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in 11 US clinical research centers for the Fracture Intervention Trial and 180 centers in the United States and other countries for the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Trial. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Postmenopausal women with low BMD assigned to treatment with 5 mg/d of alendronate sodium in the Fracture intervention Trial who completed 2 years of BMD monitoring and adhered to study medication (n = 2634), and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis assigned to treatment with 60 or 120 mg/d of raloxifene hydrochloride in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation trial who similarly completed 2 years of monitoring while adhering to study medication (n = 3954). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline, 12-, and 24-month hip and spine BMD. RESULTS: Women with the greatest loss of BMD during the first year of treatment were the most likely to gain BMD during continued treatment. Specifically, among women taking alendronate whose hip BMD decreased by more than 4% during the first year, 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-84%)had increases in hip BMD during the second year, with an overall mean increase of 4.7%. In contrast, those who seemed to gain at least 8% during the first year lost an average of 1% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.9%) during the next year. Similar results were observed among women taking raloxifene for 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that most women who lose BMD during the first year of treatment with alendronate or raloxifene will gain BMD if the same treatment is continued for a second year. These results illustrate the principle of regression to the mean and suggest that effective treatments for osteoporosis should not be changed because of loss of BMD during the first year of use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cummings, S. R. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.24.2077 · Cited by 2,277
Self-citation
Cited by
The effects of organic nitrates on osteoporosis: A systematic review
Jamal, S. A., Reid, L. S., & Hamilton, C. J. (2013) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-012-2262-9 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Cummings, S. R.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-03-08
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1318
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2016739847
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring Osteoporosis Therapy With Bone Densitometry<SUBTITLE>Misleading Changes and Regression to the Mean</SUBTITLE>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.283.10.1318
- The paper
- Cummings, S. R. (2000). Monitoring Osteoporosis Therapy With Bone Densitometry<SUBTITLE>Misleading Changes and Regression to the Mean</SUBTITLE>. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.10.1318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.