The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trends in Medical Use and Abuse of Opioid Analgesics
Abstract
CONTEXT: Pain often is inadequately treated due in part to reluctance about using opioid analgesics and fear that they will be abused. Although international and national expert groups have determined that opioid analgesics are essential for the relief of pain, little information has been available about the health consequences of the abuse of these drugs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of drug abuse related to opioid analgesics and the trends in medical use and abuse of 5 opioid analgesics used to treat severe pain: fentanyl, hydromorphone, meperidine, morphine, and oxycodone. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective survey of medical records from 1990 to 1996 stored in the databases of the Drug Abuse Warning Network (source of abuse data) and the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (source of medical use data). PATIENTS: Nationally representative sample of hospital emergency department admissions resulting from drug abuse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical use in grams and grams per 100,000 population and mentions of drug abuse by number and percentage of the population. RESULTS: From 1990 to 1996, there were increases in medical use of morphine (59%; 2.2 to 3.5 million g), fentanyl (1168%; 3263 to 41,371 g), oxycodone (23%; 1.6 to 2.0 million g), and hydromorphone (19%; 118,455 to 141,325 g), and a decrease in the medical use of meperidine (35%; 5.2 to 3.4 million g). During the same period, the total number of drug abuse mentions per year due to opioid analgesics increased from 32,430 to 34,563 (6.6%), although the proportion of mentions for opioid abuse relative to total drug abuse mentions decreased from 5.1% to 3.8%. Reports of abuse decreased for meperidine (39%; 1335 to 806), oxycodone (29%; 4526 to 3190), fentanyl (59%; 59 to 24), and hydromorphone (15%; 718 to 609), and increased for morphine (3%; 838 to 865). CONCLUSIONS: The trend of increasing medical use of opioid analgesics to treat pain does not appear to contribute to increases in the health consequences of opioid analgesic abuse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations
Kaner, E. F., Beyer, F. R., Muirhead, C., Campbell, F., Pienaar, E. D., Bertholet, N., Daeppen, J. B., Saunders, J. B., & Burnand, B. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004148.pub4 · Cited by 1,665
Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use
Jones, J. D., Mogali, S., & Comer, S. D. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.004 · Cited by 703
Increasing deaths from opioid analgesics in the United States
Paulozzi, L. J., Budnitz, D. S., & Xi, Y. (2006) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.1276 · Cited by 696
Development and validation of the Current Opioid Misuse Measure
Butler, S. F., Budman, S. H., Fernandez, K. C., Houle, B., Benoit, C., Katz, N., & Jamison, R. N. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.014 · Cited by 651
Keyes, K. M., Cerdá, M., Brady, J. E., Havens, J. R., & Galea, S. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301709 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Joranson, D. E.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-04-05
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1710
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2024150610
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Medical Use and Abuse of Opioid Analgesics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.283.13.1710
- The paper
- Joranson, D. E. (2000). Trends in Medical Use and Abuse of Opioid Analgesics. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.13.1710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.