Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Clinical Outcomes: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration Workshop Report

Bernard, Gordon R., Sopko, George, Cerra, Frank, Demling, Robert, Edmunds, Henry, Kaplan, Samuel, Kessler, Larry, Masur, Henry, Parsons, Polly, Shure, Deborah, Webb, Carol, Wiedemann, Herbert, Weinmann, Gail, Williams, David·2000·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of the pulmonary artery catheter are under scrutiny because of its association with increased morbidity and mortality in observational studies. In response, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted the Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Clinical Outcomes workshop in Alexandria, Va, on August 25 and 26, 1997, to develop recommendations regarding actions to improve pulmonary artery catheter utility and safety. PARTICIPANTS: The NHLBI and FDA planning task force selected a workshop chairperson, subcommittee chairs, and participants. Approximately 85 participants were selected for their collective expertise in critical care, pulmonary medicine, cardiovascular medicine and surgery, pediatrics, nursing, biostatistics, and medical economics. The meeting was open to industry representatives and other government and lay observers. This workshop was funded by the NHLBI and the FDA's Division of Devices. EVIDENCE: Published reports relating to the efficacy and safety of the pulmonary artery catheter, especially consensus documents developed by professional societies. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The planning task force disseminated materials, held teleconferences, and developed draft position papers prior to the workshop. These were modified during the workshop and thereafter in the course of several teleconferences, and presented to the entire group for final modifications and approval. CONCLUSIONS: A need exists for collaborative education of physicians and nurses in performing, obtaining, and interpreting information from the use of pulmonary artery catheters. This effort should be led by professional societies, in collaboration with federal agencies, with the purpose of developing and disseminating standardized educational programs. Areas given high priority for clinical trials were pulmonary artery catheter use in persistent/refractory congestive heart failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, severe sepsis and septic shock, and low-risk coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2000;283:2568-2572

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.283.19.2568

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Bernard, G. R., Sopko, G., Cerra, F., Demling, R., Edmunds, H., Kaplan, S., Kessler, L., Masur, H., Parsons, P., Shure, D., Webb, C., Wiedemann, H., Weinmann, G., & Williams, D.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2000-05-17
Volume
283
Issue
19
Pages
2568
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2158076174
Cited by
198
References
1
FWCI
14.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Clinical Outcomes: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration Workshop Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.283.19.2568
The paper
Bernard, G. R., Sopko, G., Cerra, F., Demling, R., Edmunds, H., Kaplan, S., Kessler, L., Masur, H., Parsons, P., Shure, D., Webb, C., Wiedemann, H., Weinmann, G., & Williams, D. (2000). Pulmonary Artery Catheterization and Clinical Outcomes: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration Workshop Report. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.19.2568

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.