Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of C282Y and H63D Mutations in the Hemochromatosis (HFE) Gene in the United States

Open access
Steinberg, Karen K., Cogswell, Mary E., Chang, Joy C., Caudill, Samuel P., McQuillan, Geraldine M., Bowman, Barbara A., Grummer-Strawn, Laurence M., Sampson, Eric J., Khoury, Muin J., Gallagher, Margaret L.·2001·JAMA

Abstract

Context: Population-based estimates of the prevalence of disease-associated mutations, such as hemochromatosis (HFE) gene mutations, are needed to determine the usefulness of genetic screening. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of the HFE mutations C282Y and H63D in the US population. Design: Cross-sectional population-based study of samples in the DNA bank from phase 2 of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted from 1992 to 1994. Setting and Participants: Genotyped samples of cells from a total of 5171 participants, cross-classified by sex, age, and race/ethnicity in the analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Estimates of the prevalence of C282Y and H63D mutations. Results: The prevalence of C282Y homozygosity is estimated to be 0.26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12%-0.49%); 1.89% (95% CI, 1.48%-2.43%) for H63D homozygosity; and 1.97% (95% CI, 1.54%-2.49%) for compound heterozygosity. The prevalence estimates for C282Y heterozygosity (C282Y/wild type) are 9.54% among non-Hispanic whites, 2.33% among non-Hispanic blacks, and 2.75% among Mexican-Americans. The prevalence estimates of the C282Y mutation in the US population are 5.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-6.2%) and 13.5% (95% CI, 12.5%-14.8%) for the H63D mutation. Conclusions: Estimates of prevalence of HFE mutations are within the expected range for non-Hispanic whites and blacks but the estimated prevalence of the C282Y mutation among Mexican-Americans is less than expected. Mutation data now need to be linked to clinically relevant indices, such as transferrin saturation level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.285.17.2216

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Steinberg, K. K., Cogswell, M. E., Chang, J. C., Caudill, S. P., McQuillan, G. M., Bowman, B. A., Grummer-Strawn, L. M., Sampson, E. J., Khoury, M. J., & Gallagher, M. L.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2001-05-02
Volume
285
Issue
17
Pages
2216
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2149456232
Cited by
230
References
2
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of C282Y and H63D Mutations in the Hemochromatosis (HFE) Gene in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.285.17.2216
The paper
Steinberg, K. K., Cogswell, M. E., Chang, J. C., Caudill, S. P., McQuillan, G. M., Bowman, B. A., Grummer-Strawn, L. M., Sampson, E. J., Khoury, M. J., & Gallagher, M. L. (2001). Prevalence of C282Y and H63D Mutations in the Hemochromatosis (HFE) Gene in the United States. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.17.2216

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.