The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of New Vertebral Fracture in the Year Following a Fracture
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Vertebral fractures significantly increase lifetime risk of future fractures, but risk of further vertebral fractures in the period immediately following a vertebral fracture has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of further vertebral fracture in the year following a vertebral fracture. DESIGN AND SETTING: Analysis of data from 4 large 3-year osteoporosis treatment trials conducted at 373 study centers in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand from November 1993 to April 1998. SUBJECTS: Postmenopausal women who had been randomized to a placebo group and for whom vertebral fracture status was known at entry (n = 2725). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Occurrence of radiographically identified vertebral fracture during the year following an incident vertebral fracture. RESULTS: Subjects were a mean age of 74 years and had a mean of 28 years since menopause. The cumulative incidence of new vertebral fractures in the first year was 6.6%. Presence of 1 or more vertebral fractures at baseline increased risk of sustaining a vertebral fracture by 5-fold during the initial year of the study compared with the incidence in subjects without prevalent vertebral fractures at baseline (relative risk [RR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-8.4; P<.001). Among the 381 participants who developed an incident vertebral fracture, the incidence of a new vertebral fracture in the subsequent year was 19.2% (95% CI, 13.6%-24.8%). This risk was also increased in the presence of prevalent vertebral fractures (RR, 9.3; 95% CI, 1.2-71.6; P =.03). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that women who develop a vertebral fracture are at substantial risk for additional fracture within the next year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pre-Existing Fractures and Bone Mass Predict Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Women
Ross, P. D., Davis, J. W., Epstein, R. S., & Wasnich, R. D. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-11-919 · Cited by 1,107
Cited by
Camacho, P. M., Petak, S. M., Binkley, N., Diab, D. L., Eldeiry, L. S., Farooki, A., Harris, S. T., Hurley, D. L., Kelly, J., Lewiecki, E. M., et al. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/gl-2020-0524suppl · Cited by 1,182
Camacho, P. M., Petak, S. M., Binkley, N., Clarke, B. L., Harris, S. T., Hurley, D. L., Kleerekoper, M., Lewiecki, E. M., Miller, P. D., Narula, H. S., et al. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161435.esgl · Cited by 1,140
Skeletal remodeling in health and disease
Zaidi, M. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1593 · Cited by 1,069
Eastell, R., Rosen, C. J., Black, D. M., Cheung, A. M., Murad, M. H., & Shoback, D. (2019) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2019-00221 · Cited by 868
Black, D. M., Reid, I. R., Boonen, S., Bucci-Rechtweg, C., Cauley, J. A., Cosman, F., Cummings, S. R., Hue, T. F., Lippuner, K., Lakatos, P., et al. (2012) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.1494 · Cited by 700
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindsay, R.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-01-17
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 320
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2106975935
- Cited by
- 1,897
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 67.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of New Vertebral Fracture in the Year Following a Fracture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.285.3.320
- The paper
- Lindsay, R. (2001). Risk of New Vertebral Fracture in the Year Following a Fracture. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.3.320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.