The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Narrative Medicine: A Model for Empathy, Reflection, Profession, and Trust
Abstract
The effective practice of medicine requires narrative competence, that is, the ability to acknowledge, absorb, interpret, and act on the stories and plights of others. Medicine practiced with narrative competence, called narrative medicine, is proposed as a model for humane and effective medical practice. Adopting methods such as close reading of literature and reflective writing allows narrative medicine to examine and illuminate 4 of medicine's central narrative situations: physician and patient, physician and self, physician and colleagues, and physicians and society. With narrative competence, physicians can reach and join their patients in illness, recognize their own personal journeys through medicine, acknowledge kinship with and duties toward other health care professionals, and inaugurate consequential discourse with the public about health care. By bridging the divides that separate physicians from patients, themselves, colleagues, and society, narrative medicine offers fresh opportunities for respectful, empathic, and nourishing medical care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Medical Professionalism in Society
Wynia, M. K., Latham, S. R., Kao, A. C., Berg, J. W., & Emanuel, L. L. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199911183412112 · Cited by 331
Cited by
Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being
Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004 · Cited by 1,776
Person-centered care—ready for prime time
Ekman, I., Swedberg, K., Taft, C., Lindseth, A., Norberg, A., Brink, E., Carlsson, J., Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., Johansson, I.-L., Kjellgren, K., et al. (2011) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008 · Cited by 1,681
Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review
Derksen, F., Bensing, J., & Lagro-Janssen, A. (2013) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp13x660814 · Cited by 1,034
Halpern, J. (2003) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x · Cited by 710
Personal Life Events and Medical Student Burnout: A Multicenter Study
Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., Huntington, J. L., Lawson, K. L., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200604000-00010 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Charon, R.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-10-17
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1897
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2127223658
- Cited by
- 2,190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Narrative Medicine: A Model for Empathy, Reflection, Profession, and Trust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.286.15.1897
- The paper
- Charon, R. (2001). Narrative Medicine: A Model for Empathy, Reflection, Profession, and Trust. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.15.1897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.