The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preparedness for Clinical Practice: Reports of Graduating Residents at Academic Health Centers
Abstract
CONTEXT: Medical educators are seeking improved measures to assess the clinical competency of residents as they complete their graduate medical education. OBJECTIVE: To assess residents' perceptions of their preparedness to provide common clinical services during their last year of graduate medical education. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 1998 national survey of residents completing their training in 8 specialties (internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, obstetrics/gynecology, general surgery, orthopedic surgery, psychiatry, and anesthesiology) at academic health centers in the United States. A total of 2626 residents responded (response rate, 65%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Residents' reports of their preparedness to perform clinical and nonclinical tasks relevant to their specialties. RESULTS: Residents in all specialties rated themselves as prepared to manage most of the common conditions they would encounter in their clinical career. However, more than 10% of residents in each specialty reported that they felt unprepared to undertake 1 or more tasks relevant to their disciplines, such as caring for patients with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or substance abuse (family practice) or nursing home patients (internal medicine); performance of spinal surgery (orthopedic surgery) or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (general surgery); and management of chronic pain (anesthesiology). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, residents in their last year of training at academic health centers rate their clinical preparedness as high. However, opportunities for improvement exist in preparing residents for clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Priester, M. A., Browne, T., Iachini, A., Clone, S., DeHart, D., & Seay, K. D. (2016) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2015.09.006 · Cited by 561
The Hospitalist Movement 5 Years Later
Wachter, R. M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.4.487 · Cited by 398
Mertens, J. R., Lu, Y. W., Parthasarathy, S., Moore, C., & Weisner, C. M. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.20.2511 · Cited by 216
Patient-physician role relationships and patient activation among individuals with chronic illness
Alexander, J. A., Hearld, L. R., Mittler, J. N., & Harvey, J. (2012) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01354.x · Cited by 206
How Physicians Cope With Stillbirth or Neonatal Death: A National Survey of Obstetricians
Gold, K. J., Kuznia, A. L., & Hayward, R. A. (2008) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31817d0582 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Blumenthal, D., Gokhale, M., Campbell, E. G., & Weissman, J. S.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-09-05
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1027
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2052802039
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparedness for Clinical Practice: Reports of Graduating Residents at Academic Health Centers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.286.9.1027
- The paper
- Blumenthal, D., Gokhale, M., Campbell, E. G., & Weissman, J. S. (2001). Preparedness for Clinical Practice: Reports of Graduating Residents at Academic Health Centers. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.9.1027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.