The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 2001 Bethesda System<SUBTITLE>Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology</SUBTITLE>
Abstract
Objectives The Bethesda 2001 Workshop was convened to evaluate and update the 1991 Bethesda System terminology for reporting the results of cervical cytology. A primary objective was to develop a new approach to broaden participation in the consensus process. Participants Forum groups composed of 6 to 10 individuals were responsible for developing recommendations for discussion at the workshop. Each forum group included at least 1 cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, clinician, and international representative to ensure a broad range of views and interests. More than 400 cytopathologists, cytotechnologists, histopathologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, public health physicians, epidemiologists, patient advocates, and attorneys participated in the workshop, which was convened by the National Cancer Institute and cosponsored by 44 professional societies. More than 20 countries were represented. Evidence Literature review, expert opinion, and input from an Internet bulletin board were all considered in developing recommendations. The strength of evidence of the scientific data was considered of paramount importance. Consensus process Bethesda 2001 was a year-long iterative review process. An Internet bulletin board was used for discussion of issues and drafts of recommendations. More than 1000 comments were posted to the bulletin board over the course of 6 months. The Bethesda Workshop, held April 30-May 2, 2001, was open to the public. Postworkshop recommendations were…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The pathology laboratory used the 2001 Bethesda system for reporting results of cervical cytology and followed standard quality control procedures per the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories [18].”
From A community‐based, cross‐sectional study of hr HPV DNA self‐sampling‐based cervical cancer screening in rural Karnataka, India (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
NATURAL HISTORY OF CERVICOVAGINAL PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION IN YOUNG WOMEN
Loria, G. R., Ierman, R. O. B., Eardsley, L. E. B., & Hang, H. J. C. (1998) · Cited by 1,890
Papillomaviruses Causing Cancer: Evasion From Host-Cell Control in Early Events in Carcinogenesis
Hausen, H. Z. (2000) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.9.690 · Cited by 1,297
2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women With Cervical Cytological Abnormalities
Wright, T. C. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2120 · Cited by 1,197
Solomon, D., SCHIFFMAN, M. H., & Tarone, R. E. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.4.293 · Cited by 958
Self-citationSoloman, D. (1989) · Diagnostic Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/dc.2840050318 · Cited by 290
Jones, B. A., & Novis, D. A. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 181
Sherman, M. E., Solomon, D., SCHIFFMAN, M. H., & for the ALTS Group (2001) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/jm3v-u4hp-w8hj-68xv · Cited by 171
Self-citationAtypical Epithelial Cells and Specimen Adequacy
Davey, D. D., Woodhouse, S. L., Styer, P. E., Stastny, J. F., & Mody, D. R. (2000) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/2000-124-0203-aecasa · Cited by 134
The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses.
Hudson, E. A., Dv, C., & Brown, C. L. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 130
Broder, S. E. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480140014005 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,005 of 1,005
Incidence of cervical human papillomavirus infection in systemic lupus erythematosus women
Pinto, C. M., García‐Carrasco, M., Vallejo‐Ruiz, V., Méndez‐Martínez, S., Taboada‐Cole, A., Etchegaray‐Morales, I., Muñóz‐Guarneros, M., Reyes‐Leyva, J., & López‐Colombo, A. (2017) · Lupus · doi:10.1177/0961203316686708 · Cited by 24
Iribarren Díaz, M., Ocampo Hermida, A., González-Carreró Fojón, J., Longueira Suárez, R., Rivera Gallego, A., Casal Núñez, E., Ocampo Álvarez, A., & Cachay, E. (2017) · Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas · doi:10.17235/reed.2017.4274/2016 · Cited by 17
Andersson, S., Belkić, K., Mints, M., & Östensson, E. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199038 · Cited by 14
Bukowski, A., Hoyo, C., Hudgens, M. G., Brewster, W. R., Valea, F., Bentley, R. C., Vidal, A. C., Maguire, R. L., Schmitt, J. W., Murphy, S. K., et al. (2022) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0054 · Cited by 9
Kim, M., Kim, J., Park, N. J.-Y., & Park, J. Y. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267836 · Cited by 5
“Cytological findings were interpreted following the 2001 Bethesda System for cervicovaginal cytology reporting [18].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Solomon, D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Solomon, Diane
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-04-24
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2114
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2133765716
- Cited by
- 3,104
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 139 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 161 · 2015: 189 · 2014: 177 · 2013: 217 · 2012: 203
- FWCI
- 92.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- Bethesda system, cervical cytology, cervical cancer screening, cervical neoplasia, consensus development, international cooperation
- MeSH terms
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Laboratories, Terminology as Topic, Quality Control, Vaginal Smears
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
