Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Corwin, Howard L., Gettinger, Andrew, Pearl, Ronald G., Fink, Mitchell P., Levy, Mitchell M., Shapiro, Marc J., Corwin, Michael J., Colton, Theodore, for the EPO Critical Care Trials Group·2002·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Anemia is common in critically ill patients and results in a large number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Recent data have raised the concern that RBC transfusions may be associated with worse clinical outcomes in some patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy in critically ill patients of a weekly dosing schedule of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) to decrease the occurrence of RBC transfusion. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial conducted between December 1998 and June 2001. SETTING: A medical, surgical, or a medical/surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in each of 65 participating institutions in the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 1302 patients who had been in the ICU for 2 days and were expected to be in the ICU at least 2 more days and who met eligibility criteria were enrolled in the study; 650 patients were randomized to rHuEPO and 652 to placebo. INTERVENTION: Study drug (40 000 units of rHuEPO) or placebo was administered by subcutaneous injection on ICU day 3 and continued weekly for patients who remained in the hospital, for a total of 3 doses. Patients in the ICU on study day 21 received a fourth dose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was transfusion independence, assessed by comparing the percentage of patients in each treatment group who received any RBC transfusion between study days 1 and 28. Secondary efficacy end points identified prospectively included cumulative RBC units transfused per patient through study day 28; cumulative mortality through study day 28; change in hemoglobin from baseline; and time to first transfusion or death. RESULTS: Patients receiving rHuEPO were less likely to undergo transfusion (60.4% placebo vs 50.5% rHuEPO; P<.001; odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.83). There was a 19% reduction in the total units of RBCs transfused in the rHuEPO group (1963 units for placebo vs 1590 units for rHuEPO) and reduction in RBC units transfused per day alive (ratio of transfusion rates, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.83; P =.04). Increase in hemoglobin from baseline to study end was greater in the rHuEPO group (mean [SD], 1.32 [2] g/dL vs 0.94 [1.9] g/dL; P<.001). Mortality (14% for rHuEPO and 15% for placebo) and adverse clinical events were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, weekly administration of 40 000 units of rHuEPO reduces allogeneic RBC transfusion and increases hemoglobin. Further study is needed to determine whether this reduction in RBC transfusion results in improved clinical outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.288.22.2827

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Corwin, H. L., Gettinger, A., Pearl, R. G., Fink, M. P., Levy, M. M., Shapiro, M. J., Corwin, M. J., Colton, T., & for the EPO Critical Care Trials Group
Venue
JAMA
Published
2002-12-11
Volume
288
Issue
22
Pages
2827
ISSN
0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1975270990
Cited by
498
References
3
FWCI
18.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.288.22.2827
The paper
Corwin, H. L., Gettinger, A., Pearl, R. G., Fink, M. P., Levy, M. M., Shapiro, M. J., Corwin, M. J., Colton, T., & for the EPO Critical Care Trials Group. (2002). Efficacy of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.22.2827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.