The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physician Gender Effects in Medical Communication: A Meta-analytic Review
Abstract
CONTEXT: Physician gender has been viewed as a possible source of variation in the interpersonal aspects of medical practice, with speculation that female physicians facilitate more open and equal exchange and a different therapeutic milieu from that of male physicians. However, studies in this area are generally based on small samples, with conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and quantify the effect of physician gender on communication during medical visits. DATA SOURCES: Online database searches of English-language abstracts for the years 1967 to 2001 (MEDLINE, AIDSLINE, PsycINFO, and Bioethics); a hand search was conducted of reprint files and the reference sections of review articles and other publications. STUDY SELECTION: Studies using a communication data source, such as audiotape, videotape, or direct observation, and large national or regional studies in which physician report was used to establish length of visit, were identified through bibliographic and computerized searches. Twenty-three observational studies and 3 large physician-report studies reported in 29 publications met inclusion criteria and were rated. DATA EXTRACTION: The Cohen d was computed based on 2 reviewers' (J.A.H. and Y.A.) independent extraction of quantitative information from the publications. Study heterogeneity was tested using Q statistics and pooled effect sizes were computed using the appropriate effects model. The characteristics of the study populations were also extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Female physicians engage in significantly more active partnership behaviors, positive talk, psychosocial counseling, psychosocial question asking, and emotionally focused talk. There were no gender differences evident in the amount, quality, or manner of biomedical information giving or social conversation. Medical visits with female physicians are, on average, 2 minutes (10%) longer than those with male physicians. Obstetrics and gynecology may present a different pattern than that of primary care, with male physicians demonstrating higher levels of emotionally focused talk than their female colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Female primary care physicians engage in more communication that can be considered patient centered and have longer visits than their male colleagues. Limited studies exist outside of primary care, and gender-related practice patterns in some subspecialties may differ from those evident in primary care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues.
Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., Eisman, E. J., Kubiszyn, T. W., & Reed, G. M. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.2.128 · Cited by 1,469
Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters
Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., & Katz, N. R. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00002 · Cited by 1,069 · cited 2×
“The 2 classes of partnering behavior can be distinguished as reflecting (1) an active facilitation of partnership, or “enlistment,” or (2) a more passive or “lowereddominance” approach to partnership (see the Box for examples).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSex Differences in Patients?? and Physicians?? Communication During Primary Care Medical Visits
Drph, D. R., Lipkin, M., & Korsgaard, A. (1991) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199111000-00002 · Cited by 414
Cited by
Patient-Centered Communication, Ratings of Care, and Concordance of Patient and Physician Race
Cooper, L. A., Roter, D. L., Johnson, R. L., Ford, D. E., Steinwachs, D. M., & Powe, N. R. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00009 · Cited by 1,371
Self-citationTakeshita, J., Wang, S., Loren, A. W., Mitra, N., Shults, J., Shin, D. B., & Sawinski, D. L. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24583 · Cited by 697
Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter?
Eagly, A. H. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.007 · Cited by 682
Physician Gender and Patient-Centered Communication: A Critical Review of Empirical Research
Roter, D. L., & Hall, J. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123134 · Cited by 616
Self-citationWachtell, K., Ibsen, H., Olsen, M. H., Borch-Johnsen, K., Lindholm, L. H., Mogensen, C. E., Dahlf, B., Devereux, R. B., Beevers, G., de Faire, U., et al. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00008 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Roter, D. L., Hall, J. A., & Aoki, Y.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-08-14
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 756
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1981831528
- Cited by
- 1,427
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 74.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physician Gender Effects in Medical Communication: A Meta-analytic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.288.6.756
- The paper
- Roter, D. L., Hall, J. A., & Aoki, Y. (2002). Physician Gender Effects in Medical Communication: A Meta-analytic Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.6.756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.