Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 772

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Serum Digoxin Concentration and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure

Rathore, Saif S., Curtis, Jeptha P., Wang, Yongfei, Bristow, Michael R., Krumholz, Harlan M.·2003·JAMA

Abstract

Context: The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial reported that digoxin provided no overall mortality benefit and only a modest reduction in hospitalizations among patients with heart failure and depressed left ventricular systolic function. The clinical outcomes associated with digoxin therapy at different serum concentrations in the DIG trial have not been assessed. Objective: To assess variations in serum digoxin concentration (SDC) and their association with mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure. Design, Setting, and Patients: Post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled DIG trial, conducted from August 1991 to December 1995, with the main analysis restricted to men with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or less (n = 3782). Patients randomly assigned to receive digoxin were divided into 3 groups based on SDC at 1 month (0.5-0.8 ng/mL, n = 572; 0.9-1.1 ng/mL, n = 322; and ≥1.2 ng/mL, n = 277) and compared with patients randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 2611). Main Outcome Measure: All-cause mortality at a mean follow-up of 37 months. Results: Higher SDCs were associated with increased crude all-cause mortality rates (0.5-0.8 ng/mL, 29.9%; 0.9-1.1 ng/mL, 38.8%; and ≥1.2 ng/mL, 48.0%; P = .006 for trend). Patients with SDCs of 0.5 to 0.8 ng/mL had a 6.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1%-10.5%) lower mortality rate compared with patients receiving placebo. Digoxin was not associated with a reduction in mortality among patients with SDCs of 0.9 to 1.1 ng/mL (2.6% increase; 95% CI, − 3.0% to 8.3%), whereas patients with SDCs of 1.2 ng/mL and higher had an 11.8% (95% CI, 5.7%-18.0%) higher absolute mortality rate than patients receiving placebo. The association between SDC and mortality persisted after multivariable adjustment (SDC 0.5-0.8 ng/mL hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI, 0.68-0.94; SDC 0.9-1.1 ng/mL HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.74-1.08; SDC ≥1.2 ng/mL HR 1.16, 95% CI, 0.96-1.39; and HR of 1.00 [referent] for placebo). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that higher SDCs were associated with increased mortality and suggest that the effectiveness of digoxin therapy in men with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or less may be optimized in the SDC range of 0.5 to 0.8 ng/mL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.289.7.871

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 772

Metadata

Authors
Rathore, S. S., Curtis, J. P., Wang, Y., Bristow, M. R., & Krumholz, H. M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2003-02-19
Volume
289
Issue
7
Pages
871
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1970151280
Cited by
772
References
1
FWCI
26.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Serum Digoxin Concentration and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.289.7.871
The paper
Rathore, S. S., Curtis, J. P., Wang, Y., Bristow, M. R., & Krumholz, H. M. (2003). Association of Serum Digoxin Concentration and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.7.871

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.