Cited by 616Healthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationEmergency and Acute Care StudiesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Advanced Access: Reducing Waiting and Delays in Primary Care

Murray, Mark, Berwick, Donald M.·2003·JAMA

Abstract

Delay of care is a persistent and undesirable feature of current health care systems. Although delay seems to be inevitable and linked to resource limitations, it often is neither. Rather, it is usually the result of unplanned, irrational scheduling and resource allocation. Application of queuing theory and principles of industrial engineering, adapted appropriately to clinical settings, can reduce delay substantially, even in small practices, without requiring additional resources. One model, sometimes referred to as advanced access , has increasingly been shown to reduce waiting times in primary care. The core principle of advanced access is that patients calling to schedule a physician visit are offered an appointment the same day. Advanced access is not sustainable if patient demand for appointments is permanently greater than physician capacity to offer appointments. Six elements of advanced access are important in its application balancing supply and demand, reducing backlog, reducing the variety of appointment types, developing contingency plans for unusual circumstances, working to adjust demand profiles, and increasing the availability of bottleneck resources. Although these principles are powerful, they are counter to deeply held beliefs and established practices in health care organizations. Adopting these principles requires strong leadership investment and support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.289.8.1035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The scarcity of availability and long wait times hinder patients from accessing timely evaluations, and their conditions may deteriorate before being identified and treated.

    “The scarcity of availability and long wait times hinder patients from accessing timely evaluations, and their conditions may deteriorate before being identified and treated [279,280].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 616

Authors
Murray, M., & Berwick, D. M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2003-02-26
Volume
289
Issue
8
Pages
1035
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2170171316
Cited by
616
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 24
FWCI
36.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
advanced access, waiting time, primary care, appointment scheduling, queueing theory, industrial engineering, supply and demand balancing, resource bottlenecks, demand profiles, leadership
MeSH terms
Appointments and Schedules, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Primary Health Care, United States, Waiting Lists, Models, Organizational, Time Management, Total Quality Management, Resource Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review