The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of Controllable Lifestyle on Recent Trends in Specialty Choice by US Medical Students
Abstract
CONTEXT: Recent specialty choices of graduating US medical students suggest that lifestyle may be an increasingly important factor in their career decision making. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether and to what degree controllable lifestyle and other specialty-related characteristics are associated with recent (1996-2002) changes in the specialty preferences of US senior medical students. DESIGN AND SETTING: Specialty preference was based on analysis of results from the National Resident Matching Program, the San Francisco Matching Program, and the American Urological Association Matching Program from 1996 to 2002. Specialty lifestyle (controllable vs uncontrollable) was classified using earlier research. Log-linear models were developed that examined specialty preference and the specialty's controllability, income, work hours, and years of graduate medical education required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of variability in specialty preference from 1996 to 2002 explained by controllable lifestyle. RESULTS: The specialty preferences of US senior medical students, as determined by the distribution of applicants across selected specialties, changed significantly from 1996 to 2002 (P<.001). In the log-linear model, controllable lifestyle explained 55% of the variability in specialty preference from 1996 to 2002 after controlling for income, work hours, and years of graduate medical education required (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Perception of controllable lifestyle accounts for most of the variability in recent changing patterns in the specialty choices of graduating US medical students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Krasner, M. S. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1384 · Cited by 1,650
Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator
Wallace, J. E., Lemaire, J. B., & Ghali, W. A. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61424-0 · Cited by 1,608
The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective
Jagsi, R., Guancial, E. A., Worobey, C. C., Henault, L. E., Chang, Y., Starr, R., Tarbell, N. J., & Hylek, E. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa053910 · Cited by 870
When Callings Are Calling: Crafting Work and Leisure in Pursuit of Unanswered Occupational Callings
Berg, J. M., Grant, A. M., & Johnson, V. (2010) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0497 · Cited by 720
Friedberg, M., Chen, P., Van Busum, K., Aunon, F., Pham, C., Caloyeras, J., Mattke, S., Pitchforth, E., Quigley, D., Brook, R., et al. (2014) · RAND Health Quarterly · doi:10.7249/rhq-03-04-01 · Cited by 707
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorsey, E. R., Jarjoura, D., & Rutecki, G. W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-09-03
- Volume
- 290
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1173
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2104588916
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 118.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Controllable Lifestyle on Recent Trends in Specialty Choice by US Medical Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.290.9.1173
- The paper
- Dorsey, E. R., Jarjoura, D., & Rutecki, G. W. (2003). Influence of Controllable Lifestyle on Recent Trends in Specialty Choice by US Medical Students. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.9.1173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.