Cited by 241Diversity and Career in MedicineGlobal Health Workforce IssuesInnovations in Medical Education

Trends in Career Choice by US Medical School Graduates

Newton, Dale A.·2003·JAMA

Abstract

Context Trends in career choice among specialties have varied greatly. Most notable is the recent decrease in the percentage of US medical student graduates choosing a primary care career, which has important implications for the US physician workforce. Objective To review temporal trends in career choice by graduates of allopathic US medical schools, focusing on US medical doctors entering residencies since 1987. Data sources Three databases, the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (AAMC GQ), the National Resident Matching Program, and the national Graduate Medical Education census, were used to review temporal trends in the number of US medical doctors entering residencies in primary care, general or subspecialty surgical, and non-primary care and nonsurgical specialties from 1987 to 2002. Data synthesis In 1987, 49.2% of all medical school graduates matched to one of the generalist residencies (internal medicine, pediatrics, or family medicine). The percentage of students matching to primary care specialties declined in the early 1990s, peaked at 53.2% in 1998, and declined to 44.2% in 2002. Concurrent with the latter decline, AAMC GQ data showed a decrease in medical student interest in primary care careers (35.6% in 1999 to 21.5% in 2002). The total percentage of US medical doctors matching to general or subspecialty surgical residencies remained stable at 11% to 12% from 1987 to 2002. During this same period, emergency medicine and plastic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.290.9.1179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General surgery residencies have the highest rate of attrition of all training programs.

    “General surgery residencies have the highest rate of attrition of all residencies [1-4].”

    From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [4]

Authors
Newton, D. A.
Affiliations
East Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Newton, Dale A.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2003-09-03
Volume
290
Issue
9
Pages
1179
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2122420284
Cited by
241
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
48.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
specialty choice, primary care providers, physician workforce, medical graduates, residency match, surgical specialties, subspecialties, temporal trends, general practice, emergency medicine, anesthesiology
MeSH terms
Career Choice, Family Practice, Health Workforce, Humans, Internship and Residency, Medicine, Specialization, Specialties, Surgical, Students, Medical, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review