The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association of Timing of Surgery for Hip Fracture and Patient Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Previous studies of surgical timing in patients with hip fracture have yielded conflicting findings on mortality and have not focused on functional outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of timing of surgical repair of hip fracture with function and other outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study including analyses matching cases of early (< or =24 hours) and late (>24 hours) surgery with propensity scores and excluding patients who might not be candidates for early surgery. SETTING: Four hospitals in the New York City metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1206 patients aged 50 years or older admitted with hip fracture over 29 months, ending December 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Function (using the Functional Independence Measure), survival, pain, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of the patients treated with surgery (n = 1178), 33.8% had surgery within 24 hours. Earlier surgery was not associated with improved mortality (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.08) or improved locomotion (difference of -0.04 points; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.39). Earlier surgery was associated with fewer days of severe and very severe pain (difference of -0.22 days; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.03) and shorter LOS by 1.94 days (P<.001), but postoperative pain and LOS after surgery did not differ. Analyses with propensity scores yielded similar results. When the cohort included only patients who were medically stable at admission and therefore eligible for early surgery, the results were unchanged except that early surgery was associated with fewer major complications (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Early surgery was not associated with improved function or mortality, but it was associated with reduced pain and LOS and probably major complications among patients medically stable at admission. Additional research is needed on whether functional outcomes may be improved. In the meantime, patients with hip fracture who are medically stable should receive early surgery when possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review
Abrahamsen, B., van Staa, T., Ariely, R., Olson, M., & Cooper, C. (2009) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3 · Cited by 1,079
Jiang, H. X., Majumdar, S. R., Dick, D. A., Moreau, M., Raso, J., Otto, D. D., & Johnston, D. W. C. (2005) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.041133 · Cited by 400
The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture
Weller, I., Wai, E. K., Jaglal, S., & Kreder, H. J. (2005) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15300 · Cited by 286
Accelerated care versus standard care among patients with hip fracture: the HIP ATTACK pilot trial
The Hip Fracture Accelerated Surgical Treatment and Care Track (HIP ATTACK) Investigators (2014) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.130901 · Cited by 125
Early Surgery Confers 1-Year Mortality Benefit in Hip-Fracture Patients
Maheshwari, K., Planchard, J., You, J., Sakr, W. A., George, J., Higuera-Rueda, C. A., Saager, L., Turan, A., & Kurz, A. (2018) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000001043 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Orosz, G. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-04-14
- Volume
- 291
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1738
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2161957613
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Timing of Surgery for Hip Fracture and Patient Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.291.14.1738
- The paper
- Orosz, G. M. (2004). Association of Timing of Surgery for Hip Fracture and Patient Outcomes. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.14.1738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.