The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lung Cancer in US Women: A Contemporary Epidemic
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in US women and is responsible for as many deaths as breast cancer and all gynecological cancers combined. Most lung cancer is caused by cigarette smoke. Despite all that is known about the devastating effects of cigarettes, one quarter of women in the United States continue to smoke. Women are targeted in tobacco advertising, and teenage girls are often drawn to cigarette smoking under a variety of social pressures. Following the increase in smoking, the death rate from lung cancer in US women rose 600% from 1930 to 1997. Women may be more susceptible than men to the carcinogenic properties of cigarette smoke. In addition, differences in the biology of lung cancer exist between the 2 sexes with higher levels of DNA adduct formation, increased CYP1A1 expression, decreased DNA repair capacity, and increased incidence of K-ras gene mutations in women. The novel estrogen receptor beta has also been detected in lung tumors and suggests that estrogen signaling may have a biological role in tumorigenesis. Given these differences and given the enormous toll this disease has on US women, undertaking sex-specific research in lung cancer is crucial. Finally, disseminating information about this epidemic may prevent a similar epidemic in other parts of the world where women are just now becoming addicted to tobacco.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shigematsu, H., Lin, L., Takahashi, T., Nomura, M., Suzuki, M., Wistuba, I. I., Fong, K. M., Lee, H., Toyooka, S., Shimizu, N., et al. (2005) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji055 · Cited by 2,377
Devesa, S. S., Bray, F., Vizcaino, A. P., & Parkin, D. M. (2005) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.21183 · Cited by 745
It's all about sex: gender, lung development and lung disease
Carey, M. A., Card, J. W., Voltz, J. W., Arbes, S. J., Germolec, D. R., Korach, K. S., & Zeldin, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.tem.2007.08.003 · Cited by 417
Risks and benefits of dietary isoflavones for cancer
Andres, S., Abraham, K., Appel, K. E., & Lampen, A. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2010.541900 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Patel, J. D., Bach, P. B., & Kris, M. G.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-04-14
- Volume
- 291
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1763
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2011676048
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung Cancer in US Women: A Contemporary Epidemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.291.14.1763
- The paper
- Patel, J. D., Bach, P. B., & Kris, M. G. (2004). Lung Cancer in US Women: A Contemporary Epidemic. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.14.1763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.