Cited by 257Sex work and related issuesReproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Monthly Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis and Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIV-1 Infection in Kenyan Sex Workers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kaul, Rupert, Kimani, Joshua, Nagelkerke, Nico J., Fonck, Karoline, Ngugi, Elizabeth N., Keli, Florence, MacDonald, Kelly S., Maclean, Ian W. +5 more·2004·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common in female sex workers (FSWs) and may enhance susceptibility to infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). OBJECTIVE: To examine regular antibiotic prophylaxis in FSWs as a strategy for reducing the incidence of bacterial STIs and HIV-1. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between 1998-2002 among FSWs in an urban slum area of Nairobi, Kenya. Of 890 FSWs screened, 466 who were seronegative for HIV-1 infection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive azithromycin (n = 230) or placebo (n = 236). Groups were well matched at baseline for sexual risk taking and STI rates. INTERVENTION: Monthly oral administration of 1 g of azithromycin or identical placebo, as directly observed therapy. All participants were provided with free condoms, risk-reduction counseling, and STI case management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary study end point was incidence of HIV-1 infection. Secondary end points were the incidence of STIs due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Treponema pallidum, and Haemophilus ducreyi, as well as bacterial vaginosis. Analysis of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection was performed post hoc. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of participants (n = 341) were followed up for 2 or more years or until they reached an administrative trial end point. Incidence of HIV-1 did not differ between treatment and placebo groups (4% [19 cases per 473 person-years of follow-up] vs 3.2% [16 cases per 495 person-years of follow-up] rate ratio [RR], 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.5). Incident HIV-1 infection was associated with preceding infection with N gonorrhoeae (rate ratio [RR], 4.9; 95% CI, 1.7-14.3) or C trachomatis (RR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.9). There was a reduced incidence in the treatment group of infection with N gonorrhoeae (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31-0.68), C trachomatis (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.57), and T vaginalis (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.78). The seroprevalence of HSV-2 infection at enrollment was 72.7%, and HSV-2 infection at baseline was independently associated with HIV-1 acquisition (RR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.5-27.1). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an association between bacterial STIs and acquisition of HIV-1 infection, the addition of monthly azithromycin prophylaxis to established HIV-1 risk reduction strategies substantially reduced the incidence of STIs but did not reduce the incidence of HIV-1. Prevalent HSV-2 infection may have been an important cofactor in acquisition of HIV-1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.291.21.2555

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study demonstrated that monthly oral administration of a 1-g dose of azithromycin reduced infection with N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis but did not decrease the incidence of HIV transmission.

    “One study demonstrated that monthly oral administration of a 1-g dose of azithromycin reduced infection with N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis but did not decrease the incidence of HIV transmission (240).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [240]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 257

Authors
Kaul, R., Kimani, J., Nagelkerke, N. J., Fonck, K., Ngugi, E. N., Keli, F., MacDonald, K. S., Maclean, I. W., Bwayo, J. J., Temmerman, M., Ronald, A. R., Moses, S., & for the Kibera HIV Study Group
Affiliations
University of Nairobi (KE)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2004-06-02
Volume
291
Issue
21
Pages
2555
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2098985784
Cited by
257
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
63.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
antibiotic prophylaxis, azithromycin, female sex workers, HIV-1 infection, sexually transmitted infections, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Treponema pallidum, Haemophilus ducreyi, bacterial vaginosis, herpes simplex virus type 2, HIV prevention, Kenya, urban slum
MeSH terms
Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Double-Blind Method, Female, Herpes Genitalis, Humans, Kenya, Sex Work, Risk Factors, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial, HIV-1, HIV Infections, Incidence, Prevalence, Azithromycin, Herpesvirus 2, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review