The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Patients’ Requests for Direct-to-Consumer Advertised Antidepressants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs in the United States is both ubiquitous and controversial. Critics charge that it leads to overprescribing, while proponents counter that it helps avert underuse of effective treatments, especially for conditions that are poorly recognized or stigmatized. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the effects of patients' DTC-related requests on physicians' initial treatment decisions in patients with depressive symptoms. DESIGN: Randomized trial using standardized patients (SPs). Six SP roles were created by crossing 2 conditions (major depression or adjustment disorder with depressed mood) with 3 request types (brand-specific, general, or none). SETTING: Offices of primary care physicians in Sacramento, Calif; San Francisco, Calif; and Rochester, NY, between May 2003 and May 2004. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-two family physicians and general internists recruited from solo and group practices and health maintenance organizations; cooperation rates ranged from 53% to 61%. INTERVENTIONS: The SPs were randomly assigned to make 298 unannounced visits, with assignments constrained so physicians saw 1 SP with major depression and 1 with adjustment disorder. The SPs made a brand-specific drug request, a general drug request, or no request (control condition) in approximately one third of visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on prescribing, mental health referral, and primary care follow-up obtained from SP written reports, visit audiorecordings, chart review, and analysis of written prescriptions and drug samples. The effects of request type on prescribing were evaluated using contingency tables and confirmed in generalized linear mixed models that accounted for clustering and adjusted for site, physician, and visit characteristics. RESULTS: Standardized patient role fidelity was excellent, and the suspicion rate that physicians had seen an SP was 13%. In major depression, rates of antidepressant prescribing were 53%, 76%, and 31% for SPs making brand-specific, general, and no requests, respectively (P<.001). In adjustment disorder, antidepressant prescribing rates were 55%, 39%, and 10%, respectively (P<.001). The results were confirmed in multivariate models. Minimally acceptable initial care (any combination of an antidepressant, mental health referral, or follow-up within 2 weeks) was offered to 98% of SPs in the major depression role making a general request, 90% of those making a brand-specific request, and 56% of those making no request (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' requests have a profound effect on physician prescribing in major depression and adjustment disorder. Direct-to-consumer advertising may have competing effects on quality, potentially both averting underuse and promoting overuse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SSRI Antidepressant Medications: Adverse Effects and Tolerability
Ferguson, J. M. (2001) · The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders · doi:10.4088/pcc.v03n0105 · Cited by 669
Identification of patient attitudes and preferences regarding treatment of depression
Cooper-Patrick, L., Powe, N. R., Jenckes, M. W., Gonzales, J. J., Levine, D. M., & Ford, D. E. (1997) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00075.x · Cited by 381
Rural‐Urban Differences in Stigma and the Use of Care for Depressive Disorders
Rost, K., Smith, G. R., & Taylor, J. L. (1993) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.1993.tb00495.x · Cited by 204
Evidence review: efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressant treatment in primary care
Simon, G. E. (2002) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0163-8343(02)00198-6 · Cited by 132
Two-year effects of quality improvement programs on medication management for depression
Unützer, J., Rubenstein, L., Katon, W. J., Tang, L., Duan, N., Lagomasino, I. T., & Wells, K. B. (2001) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.10.935 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Assessment in medical education
Epstein, R. M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra054784 · Cited by 1,872
Self-citationSerotonin and Depression: A Disconnect between the Advertisements and the Scientific Literature
Lacasse, J. R., & Leo, J. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020392 · Cited by 377
Patient-Centered Communication and Diagnostic Testing
Epstein, R. M. (2005) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.348 · Cited by 373
Self-citationNational trends in psychotherapy by office-based psychiatrists
Mojtabai, R., & Olfson, M. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.962 · Cited by 283
Practice constraints, behavioral problems, and dementia care: primary care physicians' perspectives
Hinton, L., Franz, C. E., Reddy, G., Flores, Y., Kravitz, R. L., & Barker, J. C. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0317-y · Cited by 268
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kravitz, R. L., Epstein, R. M., Feldman, M. D., Franz, C. E., Azari, R., Wilkes, M. S., Hinton, L., & Franks, P.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-04-27
- Volume
- 293
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1995
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2160590358
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 41.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Patients’ Requests for Direct-to-Consumer Advertised Antidepressants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.293.16.1995
- The paper
- Kravitz, R. L., Epstein, R. M., Feldman, M. D., Franz, C. E., Azari, R., Wilkes, M. S., Hinton, L., & Franks, P. (2005). Influence of Patients’ Requests for Direct-to-Consumer Advertised Antidepressants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.16.1995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.